Page 169 - Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
P. 169

150 Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery


























                          FIG. 5.7. Axial velocity profiles in a compressor (Howell 1945). (Courtesy of the
                                              Institution of Mechanical Engineers).

                          rapidly thicken through the first few stages and the axial velocity profile becomes
                          increasingly peaked. This effect is illustrated in Figure 5.7, from the experimental
                          results of Howell (1945), which shows axial velocity traverses through a four-stage
                          compressor. Over the central region of the blade, the axial velocity is higher than
                          the mean value based on the through flow. The mean blade section (and most of
                          the span) will, therefore, do less work than is estimated from the velocity triangles
                          based on the mean axial velocity. In theory it would be expected that the tip and
                          root sections would provide a compensatory effect because of the low axial velocity
                          in these regions. Due to stalling of these sections (and tip leakage) no such work
                          increase actually occurs, and the net result is that the work done by the whole blade
                          is below the design figure. Howell (1945) suggested that the stagnation enthalpy
                          rise across a stage could be expressed as

                              h 03  h 01 D  U.c y2  c y1 /,                               (5.29)
                          where   is a “work done”. For multistage compressors Howell recommended for   a
                          mean value of 0.86. Using a similar argument for axial turbines, the increase in axial
                          velocity at the pitch-line gives an increase in the amount of work done, which is then
                          roughly cancelled out by the loss in work done at the blade ends. Thus, for turbines,
                          no “work done” factor is required as a correction in performance calculations.
                            Other workers have suggested that   should be high at entry (0.96) where the
                          annulus wall boundary layers are thin, reducing progressively in the later stages
                          of the compressor (0.85). Howell (1950) has given mean “work done” factors for
                          compressors with varying numbers of stages, as in Figure 5.9. For a four-stage
                          compressor the value of   would be 0.9 which would be applied to all four stages.
                            Smith (1970) commented upon the rather pronounced deterioration of compressor
                          performance implied by the example given in Figure 5.7 and suggested that things
                          are not so bad as suggested. As an example of modern practice he gave the axial
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174