Page 211 - Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
P. 211

192 Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
                          geometry and flow conditions, its application to the design of axial-flow compressors
                          has been rather limited. The extensions of actuator disc theory to the solution of
                          the complex three-dimensional, compressible flows in compressors with varying
                          hub and tip radii and non-uniform total pressure distributions were found to have
                          become too unwieldy in practice. In recent years advanced computational methods
                          have been successfully evolved for predicting the meridional compressible flow in
                          turbomachines with flared annulus walls.
                            Reviews of numerical methods used to analyse the flow in turbomachines have
                          been given by Gostelow et al. (1969), Japikse (1976), Macchi (1985) and Whitfield
                          and Baines (1990) among many others. The literature on computer-aided methods
                          of solving flow problems is now extremely extensive and no attempt is made here
                          to summarise the progress. The real flow in a turbomachine is three-dimensional,
                          unsteady, viscous and is usually compressible, if not transonic or even supersonic.
                          According to Macchi the solution of the full equations of motion with the actual
                          boundary conditions of the turbomachine is still beyond the capabilities of the most
                          powerful modern computers. The best fully three-dimensional methods available are
                          still only simplifications of the real flow.

                          Through-flow methods
                            In any of the so-called through-flow methods the equations of motion to be solved
                          are simplified. First, the flow is taken to be steady in both the absolute and relative
                          frames of reference. Secondly, outside of the blade rows the flow is assumed to
                          be axisymmetric, which means that the effects of wakes from an upstream blade
                          row are understood to have “mixed out” so as to give uniform circumferential
                          conditions. Within the blade rows the effects of the blades themselves are modelled
                          by using a passage averaging technique or an equivalent process. Clearly, with these
                          major assumptions, solutions obtained with these through-flow methods can be only
                          approximations to the real flow. As a step beyond this Stow (1985) has outlined the
                          ways, supported by equations, of including the viscous flow effects into the flow
                          calculations.
                            Three of the most widely used techniques for solving through-flow problems are:
                          (1) Streamline curvature, which is based on an iterative procedure, is described in
                             some detail by Macchi (1985) and earlier by Smith (1966). It is the oldest and
                             most widely used method for solving the through-flow problem in axial-flow
                             turbomachines and has with the intrinsic capability of being able to handle
                             variously shaped boundaries with ease. The method is widely used in the gas
                             turbine industry.
                          (2) Matrix through-flow or finite difference solutions (Marsh 1968), where computa-
                             tions of the radial equilibrium flow field are made at a number of axial locations
                             within each blade row as well as at the leading and trailing edges and outside
                             of the blade row. An illustration of a typical computing mesh for a single blade
                             row is shown in Figure 6.14.
                          (3) Time-marching (Denton 1985), where the computation starts from some
                             assumed flow field and the governing equations are marched forward with time.
                             The method, although slow because of the large number of iterations needed to
                             reach a convergent solution, can be used to solve both subsonic and supersonic
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216