Page 382 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 382

358               SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                      This  model  gives  reasonable  qualitative  agreement  with  experimental  observations,
                    as exemplified by  the bifurcation diagram of  Figure 5.34 and  the phase-plane plots of
                    Figure 5.35. Beyond the Hopf bifurcation (at u = UH), the maximum and minimum ampli-
                    tudes of the ensuing limit cycle are shown. At  upf, a pitchfork bifurcation takes place,
                    destroying the symmetry of the limit cycle [see also Figure 5.35(a)], which in the exper-
                    iments  corresponds to  the  motion  biased  towards  one  of  the  bars;  this  is  followed  at
                    up2 by period-2 [cf. Figure 5.35(b)], period-4 [Figure 5.35(c)], period-8, etc. bifurcations,
                    leading to chaos  [Figure 5.35(d)]. Thus Figures 5.34 and 5.35 clearly establish that the
                    period-doubling route  to chaos is followed in this case (Moon  1992): a theoretically infi-
                    nite  sequence of  successive period-doubling bifurcations leading  to  an  ever-increasing
                    period  of  oscillation, aperiodicity and chaos. An  outstanding feature of  this scenario is
                    that it can be represented by  a very simple map (Feigenbaum 1978) and that successive
                    values of these bifurcations, uj, obey the following rule:

                                                                                        (5.132)

                    where Fe  is the Feigenbaum number. In practice, this value of Fe is approached by  the
                    third or fourth period doubling (Moon  1992). Indeed, in  this case, taking the first three
                    period-doubling  bifurcations  into  account  and  then  the  second-to-fourth sequence, we
                    obtain Fe = 4.124 and 4.613, the latter being quite close to the value in (5.132).
                      The quantitative agreement with experiment for the critical values of u associated with
                    key bifurcations in Figure 5.34 is quite reasonable (within - 20%). However, this agree-
                    ment is achieved by grossly straining (relaxing) the values of some parameters, as follows:





                               1 .o



                               0.5






                              -0.5


                              -1.0


                              -1.5
                                6.0        6.5        7.0       7.5        8.0       8.5
                                                       Flow velocity, u
                    Figure 5.34  Analytical  bifurcation diagram  of  the  tip-displacement of  the  loosely  constrained
                    cantilevered pipe  (N = 2, a! = 5  x   B = 0.2, y  = 10, tb = 0.82, K  = loo), showing the  onset
                          of chaos through a cascade of period-doubling bifurcations  (Paldoussis et al. 1989).
   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387