Page 383 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 383

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: NONLINEAR AND CHAOTIC DYNAMICS          359

















            20.  .   1  .  .  ?  '  .  .  ,...-.-..-   20  .... I  .  -  -
            15                     u = 8.025
        -                                    10  -
         c-  10
         h
         v
        'F  5
         d
         .-                                   0-
         x
         -  o
         s  -5                              -10  -
           -10
           -15   .      .'  ..  '  .'.'..-.   -20   . ' . . '. . .  .
             -1.0   -0.5   0.0   0.5   1.0   1.5   -1.5   -1.0   4.5   0.0   0.5   1.0   1.5
              (C)                              (d)
                                      Displacement, q(1,~)

     Figure 5.35  Phase-plane  plots  corresponding  to  selected  u  in  Figure 5.34:  (a) u = 7.9;
                 (b) u = 8.00; (c) u = 8.025; (d) u = 8.100 (PaYdoussis et al. 1989).

     (i) the constraining bars are located at <b  xb/L = 0.82 and (ii) the cubic spring stiffness
     is K  = 102-103 in the model, while <b  = 0.65 and K - 6 (lo5) in the experiments; without
     such straining, the numerical solutions diverge. Furthermore, the predicted amplitudes
     of  motion are unrealistically large (Figure 5.35). Hence, improvements to the analytical
     model are necessary, and they are discussed farther on.
       A  few  explanatory  words  may  be  appropriate  on  how  bifurcation  diagrams
     are  constructed. The  amplitude  of  the  free-end  displacement,  ~(1, = $l(l)ql(t) +
                                                                t)
     &(l)q2(t)   is recorded and plotted when rj(1,  t) = 0, &(l) being the beam eigenfunctions
     at 6 = 1 and  qi(t) the  corresponding generalized coordinates; thus, both  positive and
     negative amplitudes are recorded in Figure 5.34. Once the symmetry of  the solutions is
     broken, at upf, only one branch of the solution shown in the figure is normally obtained.
     However,  by  conducting  simulations with  two  'opposite'  sets  of  initial  conditions,
     41 (0) = q2(0)  = fO. 1 and ql(0) = &(O) = 0, the two different solution branches (four,
     in effect: two positive and two negative, as explained above) are obtained.
       The bifurcation diagram in Figure 5.34 and the phase portrait of Figure 5.35(d) may be
     considered to be sufficient evidence of  the existence of  chaotic regions in the parameter
     space of  the  system.  However, even more  definitive discriminators are the  Lyapunov
     exponents (Guckenheimer & Holmes 1983; Moon  1992), discussed next.
       Here  also,  an  explanatory paragraph  may  be  useful  to  the  reader. Consider the  n-
     dimensional system  y = f(y)  with  a  solution  $(t) corresponding to  a  set  of  initial
     conditions 4(t0) = $0.  Of  concern here is  the  stability of  $(t). Suppose that  $l(t) is
   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388