Page 162 - Foundations of Cognitive Psychology : Core Readings
P. 162

166   Philip G. Zimbardo and Richard J. Gerrig
















                Figure 7.24
                Depth ambiguity.


                Depth Perception
                Until now, we have considered only two-dimensional patterns on flat surfaces.
                Everyday perceiving, however, involves objects in three-dimensional space.
                Perceiving all three spatial dimensions is absolutely vital for you to approach
                what you want, such as interesting people and good food, and avoid what is
                dangerous, such as speeding cars and falling comets. This perception requires
                accurate information about depth (the distance from you to an object) as well as
                about its direction from you. Your ears can help in determining direction, but
                they are not much help in determining depth.
                  When you think about depth perception, keep in mind that the visual system
                must rely on retinal images that have only two spatial dimensions—vertical
                and horizontal. To illustrate the problem of having a 2-D retina doing a 3-D job,
                consider the situation shown in figure 7.24. When a spot of light stimulates the
                retina at point a, how do you know whether it came from position a 1 or a 2 ?In
                fact, it could have come from anywhere along line A, because light from any
                point on that line projects onto the same retinal cell. Similarly, all points on line
                B project onto the single retinal point b. To make matters worse, a straight line
                connecting any point on line A to any point on line B (a 1 to b 2 or a 2 to b 1 ,for
                example) wouldproduce thesameimage on theretina. Thenet result is that the
                image on your retina is ambiguous in depth: it could have been produced by
                objects at any one of several different distances.
                  Thetwo possibleviews of theNeckercubefromfigure 7.6resultfromthis
                ambiguity in depth. The fact that you can be fooled under certain circum-
                stances shows that depth perception requires an interpretation of sensory input
                and that this interpretation can be wrong. (You already know this if you’ve
                ever swung at a tennis ball and come up only with air.) Your interpretation of
                depth relies on many different information sources about distance (often called
                depth cues)—among them binocular cues, motion cues, and pictorial cues.
                Binocular and Motion Cues  Have you ever wondered why you have two eyes
                instead of just one? The second eye is more than just a spare—it provides some
                of the best, most compelling information about depth. The two sources of bino-
                cular depth information are binocular disparity and convergence.
                  Because the eyes are about two to three inches apart horizontally, they re-
                ceive slightly different views of the world. To convince yourself of this, try the
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167