Page 173 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 173

1656_C003.fm  Page 153  Monday, May 23, 2005  5:42 PM





                       Elastic-Plastic Fracture  Mechanics                                         153

















                                                               FIGURE 3.47 Single- and two-parameter assump-
                                                               tions in terms of the three independent variables in the
                                                               elastic-plastic crack-tip field. The loading path initially
                                                               lines in the two-parameter surface and then diverges,
                                                               as indicated by the dashed line.


                       single-parameter line. When it deviates from this line, it may remain in the two-parameter surface
                       for a time before diverging from the surface.
                          The loading path in J-A -A  space depends on geometry [43]. Low-constraint configurations
                                                4
                                              2
                       such as the center-cracked panel and shallow notched bend specimens diverge from the single-
                       parameter theory almost immediately, but follow Equation (3.88) to fairly high deformation levels.
                       Deeply notched bend specimens maintain a high constraint to relatively high J values, but they do
                       not follow Equation (3.88) when constraint loss eventually occurs. Thus low-constraint geometries
                       should be treated with the two-parameter theory, and high-constraint geometries can be treated
                       with the single-parameter theory in many cases. When high-constraint geometries violate the single-
                       parameter assumption, however, the two-parameter theory is of little value.

                       APPENDIX 3:    MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ELASTIC-PLASTIC
                                      FRACTURE MECHANICS

                       A3.1 DETERMINING CTOD FROM THE STRIP-YIELD MODEL
                       Burdekin and Stone [3] applied the Westergaard [44] complex stress function approach to the strip-
                       yield model. They derived an expression for CTOD by superimposing a stress function for closure
                       forces on the crack faces in the strip-yield zone. Their result was similar to previous analyses based
                       on the strip-yield model performed by Bilby et al. [45] and Smith [46].
                          Recall from Appendix 2.3 that the Westergaard approach expresses the in-plane stresses (in a
                       limited number of cases) in terms of Z:
                                                 σ xx  =  Z Re  y −  Z Im  ′                    (A3.1a)
                                                 σ yy  =  Z Re  y +  Z Im  ′                    (A3.1b)

                                                  τ xy  y=− Re Z  ′                             (A3.1c)

                       where Z is an analytic function of the complex variable z = x + iy, and the prime denotes a first
                       derivative with respect to z. By invoking the equations of elasticity for the plane problem, it can
                       be shown that the displacement in the y direction is as follows:

                                           u =  y  1  Z 2 [Im  y −  1 (  +  ν  Z )Re ]  for plane stress  (A3.2a)
                                               E
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178