Page 135 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs

REFERENCES 115
rEFErENCES Dastidar R, Sondergeld CH, Rai CS. An improved empirical
permeability estimator from mercury injection for tight clastic
Al‐Bazali TM, Jianguo Z, Martin EC, Mukul MS. Measurement of rocks. PetroPhysics 2007;48 (3):186–190.
the sealing capacity of shale caprocks. Paper presented at SPE Dimri VP, Srivastava RP, Vedanti N, editors. Fractal Models
Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition; October 9–12, in Exploration Geophysics Applications to Hydrocarbon
2005; Dallas, TX. DOI: 10.2118/96100­MS. Reservoirs. Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier; 2012. Handbook of
Al Hinai A, Rezaee R, Saeedi A, Lenormand R. Permeability Geophysical Exploration: Seismic Exploration, Vol. 41; p 1–165.
prediction from mercury injection capillary pressure: an Dollimore D, Heal GR. An improved method for the calculation of
example from the Perth Basin, Western Australia. APPEA J pore‐size distribution from adsorption data. J Appl Chem
2013;53:31–36. 1964;14:109–114.
Al‐Raoush RI, Willson CS. Extraction of physically realistic pore Dougherty ER, Lotufo RA. Hands‐on Morphological Image
network properties from three‐dimensional synchrotron X‐ray Processing. Washington, DC: SPIE Press; 2003.
microtomography images of unconsolidated porous media Egermann P, Doerler N, Fleury M, Behot J, Deflandre F,
systems. J Hydrol 2005;300:44–64. Lenormand R. Petrophysical measurements from drill cuttings
Barret EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP. “The determination of pore an added value for the reservoir characterization process. Abu
volume and area distribution in porous substances: computations Dhabi International Conference and Exhibition; Abu Dhabi:
from nitrogen isotherms. J Am Chem Soc 1951;73:373–380. Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2004.
Boudier T. 3D Processing and Analysis with ImageJ. Paris: Egermann P, Doerler N, Fleury M, Behot J, Deflandre F,
Université Pierre et Marie Curie. http://imagejdocu.tudor.lu/lib/ Lenormand R. Petrophysical measurements from drill cuttings:
(accessed April 16, 2014). an added value for the reservoir characterization process.
Bowers MC, Ehrlich R, Howard T, Kenyon W. Determination of SPE Reserv Eval Eng 2006;9:302–307.
porosity types from NMR data and their relationship to porosity Fibics. Introduction: Focused Ion Beam Systems. 2011. Available
types derived from thin section. J Soc Pet Eng 1993;13:1–14. at http://www.fibics.com/fib/tutorials/introduction‐focused‐ion‐
Boyer C, Kieschnick J, Suarez‐Rivera R, Lewis RE, Waters G. beam‐systems/4/. Accessed June 14, 2014.
Producing gas from its source. Oilfield Rev 2006;18 (3):36–49. Gabriela AM, Lorne AD. Petrophysical measurements on shales
Brunauer S, Deming LS, Deming WE, Teller E. On a theory of the using NMR. SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting; 2000;
van der Waals adsorption of gases. J Am Chem Soc 1940;62 Long Beach, CA.
(7):1723–1732. Gale JFW, Reed RM, Holder J. Natural fractures in the barnett
Burdine NT, Gournay LS, Reichertz PP. Pore size distribution of shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments.
petroleum reservoir rocks. J Pet Technol 1950;2 (7):195–204. AAPG Bull 2007;91 (4):603–622.
Bustin RM, Bustin AMM, Cui A, Ross D, Pathi VM. Impact of shale Glorioso JC, Aguirre O, Piotti G, Mengual J‐F. Deriving capillary
properties on pore structure and storage characteristics. Paper pressure and water saturation from NMR transversal relaxation
presented at SPE Shale Gas Production Conference; November times. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum
16–18, 2008; Fort Worth, TX. DOI: 10.2118/119892­MS. Engineering Conference; Port‐of‐Spain, Trinidad and Tobago:
Butcher AR, Lemmen HJ. Advanced SEM technology clarifies Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2003.
nanoscale properties of gas accumulations in shales. The Gregg SJ, Sing KSW. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity.
American Oil and Gas Reporter. July2011. London: Academic Press; 1991. p 303.
Chalmers GR, Bustin RM, Power IM. Characterization of gas shale Grunewald E, Knight R. A laboratory study of NMR relaxation
pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and times in unconsolidated heterogeneous sediments. Geophysics
field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission elec­ 2011;76:G73–G83.
tron microscopy image analyses: examples from the Barnett, Heath JE, Dewers TA, McPherson BJOL, Petrusak R, Chidsey TC,
Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units. AAPG Bull Rinehart AJ, Mozley PS. Pore networks in continental and
2012;96:1099–1119. marine mudstones: characteristics and controls on sealing
Chen Q, Song Y‐Q. What is the shape of pores in natural rocks? J behavior. Geosphere 2011;7 (2):429–454.
Chem Phys 2002;116:8247–8250. Hidajat I, Singh M, Mohanty KK. NMR response of porous media
Churcher PL, French PR, Shaw JC, Schramm LL. Rock properties by random walk algorithm: a parallel implementation. Chem
of berea sandstone, baker dolomite, and Indiana limestone. SPE Eng Commun 2003;190 (12):1661–1680.
International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry; 1991; Hildenbrand A, Urai JL. Investigation of the morphology of pore space
Anaheim, CA. in mudstones—first results. Mar Pet Geol 2003;20:1185–1200.
Clarkson CR, Solano N, Bustin RM, Bustin AMM, Chalmers GRL, Howard JJ. Porosimetry measurements of shale fabric and its rela­
He L, Melnichenko YB, Radlin AP, Blach TP. Pore structure tionship to illite/smectite diagenesis. Clays Clay Mine 1991;39
characterization of north American shale gas reservoirs using (4):355–361.
USANS/SANS, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion. Fuel Jones FO, Owens WW. A laboratory study of low‐permeability gas
2013;103:606–616. sands. SPE J Pet Technol 1980;32:1631–1640.
Coates GR, Xiao L, Prammer MG. NMR Logging Principles and Jorgensen DG. Estimating permeability in water‐saturated
Applications. Houston: Halliburton Energy Services; 1999. formations. Log Anal 1988;296:9.