Page 221 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 221

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF ORSS  201
            Hydrous pyrolysis results in generation of hydrocarbons   transversely  isotropic  ORS  layer  of  variable  thickness  is
            and  evaporation of volatile hydrocarbons caused by high   deposited between isotropic chalk (top) and sandstone (bot­
            retort temperatures. Films of bitumen, bitumen globes, and   tom). This structure models a typical structure in the North
            bitumen flow channels were observed in the FESEM images   Sea, where a source rock with a thickness comparable to the
            of the samples after pyrolysis.  These changes led to a   seismic  wavelength  (<200  m)  underlies  a  high  velocity
            decrease in average TOC from 12.7 ± 4.3 to 9.7 ± 1.6 and   chalk. The shale, chalk, and sandstone were modeled as vis­
            average  HI  from  400  ±  231  to  51.2  ±  16.8.  The  median   coelastic materials. The ORS was assumed to be a composite
            Young’s moduli also reduced from 25.2 ± 6.3 to 15.7 ± 5.3.   rock with horizontal layers of illite, kerogen, water, and oil,
            To explain an apparent discrepancy with the well‐known fact   where the amount of oil depends on maturity of the rock.
            that more mature shales usually have higher elastic moduli,   The modeled AVO response shows a strong decrease in the
            Zargari et al. (2013) speculated that bitumen, which had   PP‐reflection coefficient with an increase in the incidence
            lower compared to kerogen elastic moduli and which would   angle. For a given  TOC content and incident angle, the
            eventually migrate away in the process of natural matura­  reflection coefficient dependency on ORS layer thickness
            tion, was partially trapped in the kerogen and caused the   exhibits an oscillatory character and the period of oscilla­
            reduction in the mean elastic moduli after pyrolysis.  tions depends on the frequency of the seismic signal. Finally,
              We would like to say again that the effects of organic   for a given layer thickness and incidence angle, the reflec­
            matter maturity on anisotropic elastic properties are complex   tion coefficient depends on the TOC content in a nonmono­
            and include microstructural transformations, decrease of   tonic way, having a minimum at a low volumetric kerogen
            TOC content, and changes in elastic moduli of organic and   content and above this value exhibiting a monotonic increase.
            inorganic components. The lenticular distribution of kerogen   The ability to predict the  TOC content from surface
            in immature ORS is believed to be the reason for extraordi­  seismic data would significantly reduce the risk of devel­
            narily high Thomsen’s ε and γ in ORSs. The general ten­  oping ORS reservoirs.  The first feasibility study into
            dency  of  anisotropy  to  decrease  with  increasing  vitrinite   estimation of TOC content from real surface seismic data
            reflectance (Fig. 9.6) to some extent can be explained with   was undertaken by Løseth et al. (2011).  They analyzed
            isolation of the remaining kerogen in the pores of the inor­  seismic data acquired on the Late Jurassic source rock for­
            ganic  matrix.  Vanorio  et  al.  (2008)  identified  a  second   mations from the North Sea (Draupne), Norwegian Sea
            maximum of Thomsen’s ε at R  ~1.3 and explained it with   (Spekk Formation), and Barents Sea (Hekkingen Formation)
                                     0
            the increase in elastic anisotropy of organic matter with   and could clearly identify the ORSs. This study also sheds
            maturity. The other two effects associated with the maturity   some light on practical details of the possibility to convert
            are changes in the elastic properties of the inorganic matrix   the acoustic impedance (AI) into a TOC content map. This
            and the increase in stress sensitivity resulting from cracks   possibility exists as both laboratory measurements and log
            induced during the maturation process. The inorganic clay   data analysis exhibit a strong nonlinear reduction in AI with
            matrix tends to become more anisotropic with increasing   an increase in TOC content and, hence, the AI of a source
            depth. Microcracks that had developed as a result of the mat­  rock with TOC > 3–4 wt% might be half that of nonsource
            uration process are preferentially oriented along the bedding   rocks. In ORSs thicker than the tuning thickness, these low
            plane according to a number of microstructural studies of   AI values together with large difference of elastic properties
            dry pyrolysis experiments (e.g., Kobchenko et al., 2011;   in directions normal and parallel to bedding result in an AVO
            Panahi et al., 2013; Yurikov et al., 2013). The presence of   class 4 seismic response at the top of the source rocks. This
            such subhorizontal cracks must also promote elastic anisot­  AVO class 4 response is characterized by a high‐amplitude
            ropy with maturity. As in reality elastic anisotropy decreases   negative reflection at the top of the reservoir and significant
            with the increase of maturity, the effects of stiffening of the   dimming with offset. The AVO class 4 responses are typical
            inorganic clay matrix and the subhorizontal cracks caused   for source rocks and are not very common for other lithol­
            by maturation must have minor effects on elastic anisotropy   ogies except coal, which has the same type of response. A
            compared to the kerogen‐laminated structure. To the best of   high‐amplitude positive reflection that also dims with offset
            our knowledge, no attempt to account for all these processes   (the AVO class 1 response) was observed at the base of the
            has been published.                                  source rock reservoir. As the kerogen fraction varies across
                                                                 ORS formations, its vertical  profiles might affect seismic
                                                                 response  at the top  and bottom boundaries.  Løseth et  al.
            9.6  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF ORSs                        (2011) found that the upward‐increasing  TOC profiles,
                                                                 which are typical for Jurassic Spekk and Draupne forma­
            Carcione was the first to model the effect of a thin source‐  tions, result in a stronger top reflection compared to the
            rock layer on  AVO responses (Carcione, 2001). He con­  basal reflection. For a downward‐increasing  TOC profile
            cluded that the TOC content of a source rock layer can be   that was observed in the Hekkingen Formation, the top
            determined with an AVO analysis. Carcione assumed that a   reflection is weaker than the basal one. These characteristics
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226