Page 273 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 273

DIFFUSION IN BULK KEROGEN  253
                    (a)                                          (b)
                      Shrunk pore                 Original size pore  Enlarged throat radius  Shrunk throat radius
                      (nanoscale)  Enlarged pore    (microscale)


















                    (c)
                        Shrunk throat length and radius



















            FIGURE 11.9  Schematic of the network models with bimodal pore size distributions. (a) Constant cross‐section model (CCM), (b) enlarged
            cross‐section model (ECM), and (c) shrunk length model (SLM).



            amount of the sorbed gas at a certain temperature and  infinite   11.6  DIFFUSION IN bULK KEROGEN
            pressure (per unit mass of sample), and α is the Langmuir
            parameter (atm ). Langmuir pressure is the inverse of   As mentioned earlier in this chapter, gas storage in gas shale
                         −1
            Langmuir parameter (α). Figure  11.11 is an exemplary   exists in three major forms: stored as compressed gas in the
            Langmuir isotherm of a shale sample.                 pore network, sorbed on the surface of organic material and
              It is important to distinguish between a source term and   possibly on clay minerals, and dissolved in liquid hydro-
            a flow term in shale gas analysis. Sorption in a shale gas   carbon and brine (interstitial and clay‐bound), and kerogen
            system is a material balance term, for example, a source   (Javadpour et al., 2007). Many research studies have
            term, and does not appear in momentum balance or flow   addressed the first two storage processes (Chareonsuppanimit
            term. Therefore,  sorption  per se does not affect perme-  et al., 2012; Civan et al., 2012; Darabi et al., 2012; Javadpour,
            ability. However, there are two processes involved in   2009; Zhang et al., 2012), but only limited research has been
              sorption that could change permeability. The first is the   conducted on the contribution of gas dissolved in organic
            change in pore size as a result of the release of gas mole-  material in the total gas production from shale reservoirs
            cules from the inner pore surfaces; the second is the   (Etminan et al., 2014; Moghanloo et al., 2013).
            change in pore pressure as a result of sorption. We showed   Figure 11.2d shows the three storage processes of gas‐in‐
            earlier that permeability in a shale system is pressure‐  place in shale gas reservoirs. The compressed gas exists in
            dependent. Shabro et al. (2011) and Swami et al. (2013)   the micro‐ and nano‐scale pores. Some of the gas molecules
            developed numerical models to link sorption and gas flow   are adsorbed on the surface of kerogen and, eventually, some
            in a shale system.                                   of the gas molecules are dissolved into the kerogen body and
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278