Page 272 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 272

252   GAS TRANSPORT PROCESSES IN SHALE

                                                                   Constant cross‐section model (CCM) (Fig. 11.9a): The
                                                                     radii of the selected pore‐volume compensating pores
                                                                     are enlarged to make up for the loss of volume. The
                                                                     cross‐sectional area of the attached throats, however,
                                                                     are kept constant. This manipulation does not affect
                                                                     fluid flow; however, it becomes important in the
                                                                     presence of desorption.
                                                                   Enlarged cross‐section model (ECM) (Fig.  11.9b): In
                                                                     addition to the sizes of the targeted pores, the sizes of
                                                                     the adjacent throats were enlarged as well.  This
                                                                     method allowed for the overlap of the shrunk and
                                                                     enlarged targeted pores and throats. Little difference
                                                                     was observed between this model and CCM.
                 Z
                                                                   Shrunk length model (SLM) (Fig. 11.9c): In this model,
              X  Y                                                   the throat lengths are shrunk as well. This procedure
                                                                     deforms the bulk geometry and further amendments
                                                                     are needed to compute gas permeability.
            FIGURE  11.8  A 3D visualization of a single scale network
            model. The pores act as pressure points whereas the throats impact
            gas flow through their conductivities.                 The three network types can be used in constructing a
                                                                 representative network model from FIB–SEM images.
                                                                 Figure 11.10 shows the simulation results of an ECM model
            pores act as pressure points with volume, whereas throats   with various nanopore fractions to study the effect of
            affect the flow by their conductivity. A network model can     multiple‐length  scales  on  the  apparent  permeability.  The
            be   constructed based on three‐dimensional focused ion   values are normalized with respect to the maximum Darcy
                                                                             max
            beam–Scanning Electron Microscopy (FIB–SEM) images   permeability  K D  .  Unlike the  Darcy  permeability,  which
            and can be used to isolate a specific effect on flow or replace   has a logarithmically linear relationship with the average
            actual expensive experiments. Mehmani et al. (2013)   throat size, there is no single slope that can describe log(K )
                                                                                                              app
            combined a multiscale 3D pore network with the transport   versus log(r ). Furthermore, the spread in a 50% fraction of
                                                                          avg
            Equations 11.6–11.8 at nanoscale to describe gas flow   nanopores could be a key in shedding light on the topology
            through ultra‐tight shale samples. Their model resulted in   of shale pores.
            nonlinear, pressure‐dependent  permeability estimates  and
            shed light on nanometer‐scale controls on transport prop-
            erties in pore systems with interconnected micrometer and   11.5  GAS SORPTION IN SHALE
            nanometer pores.
              In order to compute gas flow, one can picture the network   Gas desorption  from the surface  of organic material  is a
            model contained in a cubic box. A pressure difference is   source of gas in shale gas systems (Etminan et al., 2014;
            imposed on the inlet and outlet sides. Conservation of mass   Javadpour et al., 2007). The contribution of gas desorption to
            is imposed on each pore and given the nature of the constitu-  total gas flux depends on total organic content (TOC),
            tive equation (Javadpour, 2009) a nonlinear system  of   organic type (rank and maturity), and temperature in a shale
            equations is derived.  The authors solved the system of   reservoir (Zhang et al., 2012). The Langmuir isotherm shows
            equations by using the Newton–Raphson iterative method.   the effectiveness of the gas desorption capacity of a shale
            One can linearize the equations by assuming an averaged   sample.  The simplest theoretical model of monolayer
            constant density and viscosity, but the larger the pressure   adsorption is the Langmuir model (Ruthven, 1984). Langmuir
            difference (larger systems), the more erroneous such a   adsorption isotherm model relates the mass of the sorbed gas
            scheme will become.                                  to pressure as:
              In order to analyze the interactive effects of multiscale
            throats on gas flow, Mehmani et al., 2013 proposed 3 two‐                      ()TP
            scale network types as illustrated in Figure 11.9. The authors           max         ,         (11.16)
            included nanosize pores by targeting a certain fraction of the              1   ()TP
            pores  and  shrunk  the  targeted  pores  and  their  adjacent
            throats. The porosity of the networks was kept constant by   where Γ is the mass of adsorbed gas (g/unit mass of sample),
            enlarging a sufficient number of pores. A description of the   P is the equilibrium pressure of the gas in the system (atm),
            network model types are included below:              T is the absolute temperature (K),  Γ   is the maximum
                                                                                                max
   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277