Page 202 - Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
P. 202

FIGURE 3.14   Continuation of the example of Fig. 3.13: (a) 40-point DFT of the

               20-point sinusoid of normalized frequency 0.275, (b) 256-point DFT of the
               same sequence.



                     The off-peak sampling loss (straddle loss) for a sinusoidal signal can be
               limited to a specified value, at least for this idealized signal, by appropriate
               choice of the spectrum sampling rate K. For example, the loss can be limited to
               3 dB or less by choosing K such that the interval 2π/Κ between samples does
               not exceed the 3 dB width of the asinc function. The 3-dB width can be found by
               considering just the magnitude of Eq. (3.20)  with ω = 0 for convenience. The
               peak value of the asinc function is MA, thus it is necessary to find the value ω              3

               o f ω  such  that  the  asinc  function  has  the  value              .  This  is  best  done
               numerically.  The  answer  is  a  strong  function  of M  for  small M  but  rapidly
               approaches an asymptotic value of ω  = 2.79/M for M ≥ 10. It follows that the 3
                                                           3
               dB width of the asinc function is Δω = 5.58/M radians.
                     The sampling interval for a rate of K samples per period is 2π/Κ radians.

               Equating this to the 3-dB width and solving gives the sampling rate required to
               limit off-peak sampling attenuation to 3 dB in the Doppler spectrum in terms of
               the Nyquist rate of M samples per Doppler spectrum period,





                                                                                                       (3.21)


               which is 13 percent higher than the Nyquist sampling rate in Doppler. If the off-

               peak  sampling  loss  is  to  be  kept  significantly  less  than  3  dB,  the  Doppler
               spectrum must be oversampled still more.
                     The analysis leading to Eq. (3.21) can be repeated for any specified level
               of tolerable straddle loss. Figure 3.15 shows the worst-case straddle loss as a
               function of the oversampling factor κ (i.e., K = κ M) for the case M = 100. Both
               undersampled (κ < 1) and oversampled (κ > 1) cases are shown. The loss is
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207