Page 133 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 133

88                             Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological



                    TABLE CD5.7
                    Microscreen Coefficient and Subsequent Use of Coefficient for Design (Data from Envirex,
                    1985)—Excerpt Showing 24 Out of 40 Columns and 5 Out of 39 Rows
                    Start of spreadsheet (columns a to f ):
                                                          Plant Data
                                                                                               Size
                    Plant                  Purpose            No Units      Material     (mm)       (mesh)
                    Marin City, CA   Coarse removal              2          Polyester                60
                    Berthoud, CO     Water treatment (algae)     1          Polyester     35
                    Sterling, CO     Polishing lagoon effluent    5          Polyester      1
                    Ft. Meyers, FL   Polishing secondary effluent  2         Polyester     21
                                                   discontinuity between rows 4 to 37
                    Superior, WI     Polishing secondary effluent  2         Polyester                50

                    continuation of table (columns g to p):
                                                Calculation of HLR for Different Plants
                               Q                    D              L          A(gross screen)
                                                                                              Submergence a
                                         3
                                                                                        2
                                                                               2
                    (mgd)   (gal=min)  (m =s)   (ft)   (m)    (ft)   (m)     (ft )    (m )        (%)
                    10        6945      0.440    8     2.44    6     1.83    150.8    14.0      70.0
                    15        10417     0.660    10    3.05    10    3.05    314.2    29.2      68.3
                    0.7        486      0.031    12    3.66    16    4.88    603.2    56.0      70.4
                    1.8       1250      0.079    10    3.05    10    3.05    314.2    29.2      68.3
                                                   discontinuity between rows 4 to 37
                    6.5       4514      0.286    6     1.83    8     2.44    151      14.0      70.4
                                                                                                Calculated a
                    continuation of table (columns ag to an):

                                           Design of Microscreen of Horsetooth Reservoir Water
                    Scenario                                        HLR a           Q c
                                                                    3
                                                                                         3
                                             c
                                                                                                       2
                                                        c
                                                                                                    a
                                                                       2
                    Screen Size    K b      h (m)      w (rad=s)  (m =m =s)   (mgd)    (m =s)   A(net) (m )
                                             L
                    6            0.00036   0.30          0.10      0.00339      7       0.31       90.8
                                 0.00036   0.30          0.21      0.00479      7       0.31       64.3
                    6            0.00036   0.61          0.10      0.00479      7       0.31       64.2
                                                   discontinuity between rows 4 to 37
                                 0.00036   2.13          0.10      0.00897      7       0.31       34.3
                                 Selected b  Assumed c
                    a
                     Calculated.
                    b
                      Selected.
                    c
                     Assumed.
              While Figure 5.9 provides data from practice, the distribu-  5.5.7 MICROSCREEN MODEL
            tion covers about 1 log for HLR and about 1.5 log for K,
                                                               Figure 5.10 is a schematic of a microscreen cross section,
            which is too much variation to be useful for design. Therefore,
                                                               intended to depict some of the process variables. The steps in
            obtaining data from a full-scale plant that is similar to the one
                                                               developing a mathematical model for a microscreen are enu-
            being considered for design in character of water to be treated
                                                               merated below as Example 5.3. The idea of a mathematical
            is one approach to determine a more accurate estimate K or
                                                               model for microscreening may seem ‘‘far-fetched’’ at first
            HLR. The ultimate solution is a pilot plant which provides a
                                                               glance and it was considered here, from the standpoint of an
            means to investigate all variables comprehensively.
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138