Page 131 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 131

86                             Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological



            TABLE 5.3                                          TABLE 5.4
            Typical Design Data for Wedge-Wire Screens         Microscreens—Sizes and Manufacturers
                              Dimensions  Low   Nominal  High                  Density of Mesh
                                                               Opening Size
                                                                                  2
                                                                                           2
            v(screen) a          m=s      0.25            0.53  (Microns)   (No.=in. )  (No.=cm )  Manufacturer
            Velocity down        m=s             2–3
                                                               23            144,000   22,320  Crane Co., King of Prussia,
             screen face
                                                                                               Pennsylvania
            F                             2               30
                                                               25                              Walker Equipment Co.,
            Total head drop across  M            1.2–1.5
                                                                                               Chicago, Illinois
             structure
                                                               35             80,000   12,400  Crane Co., King of Prussia,
            w                    mm              1.52
                                                                                               Pennsylvania
            s b                  mm       0.3    1.0      13
                                                               35            120,000   18,600  Zurn Industries, Inc., Erie,
            f                    8        3      5        6
                                                                                               Pennsylvania
            u                    8               60
                                                               40                              Walker Equipment Co.,
                                                                                               Chicago, Illinois
            Sources: Wahl, T.L., Hydraulic testing of static self-cleaning inclined screens,
                                                               60             58,500   9,067   Crane Co., King of Prussia,
                   in: 1st International Conference on Water Resources Engineering,
                                                                                               Pennsylvania
                   American Society of Civil Engineering, San Antonio, TX, August
                   14–18, 1995, available from Web site: http:==www.usbr.
                                                               Source: Burns and Roe, Inc., Process Design Manual for Suspended Solids
                   gov=pmts=hydraulics_lab=twahl=coanda=; Wahl, T.L., J. Hydraul.
                                                                      Removal, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC,
                   Eng. Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 127(6), June, 2001, available from Web
                                                                      October, 1971.
                   site:http:==www.usbr.gov=pmts=hydraulics_lab=twahl=coanda=,16pp.
            a
             Calculated by upper and lower limits of experimental plot of Wahl (1995)
             from which Equation 5.6 was derived.
            b
              Higher and lower values from Hydroscreen (2002).
                                                               removal in both water treatment and in effluent from wastewater
                                                               stabilizationponds.Inconventionalwastewatertreatmentmicro-
                                                               screens have been used following secondary treatment, espe-
            5.5 MICROSCREENS
                                                               cially to help ensure that effluent standards are met.
            Microscreens are a special category of fine screens
            which have fabric openings of microns size. The removal
                                                               5.5.3 PERFORMANCE
            mechanism is straining based upon the size of opening in
            the fabric. But like many screens, the retained material  The effectiveness of a microscreen in removal of solids
            which forms a mat functions to strain particles, perhaps smal-  depends upon the mesh size and on the material being removed
            ler than the microscreen openings.                 that forms the filter mat. Removals of suspended solids and
              Table 5.4 lists some examples of microfabrics which are  BOD are given in Table 5.5 for tertiary treatment applications
            commercially available. A variety of metals and plastic are  for two mesh sizes (Burns and Roe, 1971). The BOD removals
            used to make the fabrics; carbon steel is common (Burns and  shown are associated with the suspended solids removal. The
            Roe, 1971).                                        mat of previously trapped solids provides a finer filtration or
                                                               straining capability; undoubtedly this accounts for the high
                                                               suspended-solids removal. Table 5.5 is indicative of perform-
            5.5.1 EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION
                                                               ance for tertiary treatment. Removals, for a given mesh size and
            A proprietary microstrainer is constructed with a fabric cov-  suspension, can be assessed by bench scale tests.
            ering a steel drum support frame, which rotates. In operation,  In addition to effectiveness in removal of particles, perform-
            raw water enters the interior of the drum and passes through  ance is based also on operating factors such as hydraulic
            the fabric with a loss of head; a weir at the end of the basin on  loading rate (HLR), requirements for cleaning, and mainten-
            the outer side maintains the effluent-side water level. The  ance factors. An evaluation of such performance factors as
            influent-side water level may rise to the level required in  cleaning and maintenance must be done by means of records
            order that the flow will pass, i.e., so that there is sufficient  examination of full-scale installations. For HLR determination,
            headloss. As the unit rotates, trapping suspended matter from  pilot plant testing is recommended at the site of the installation.
            the feed stream, the fabric is backwashed by a jet above the
            drum on the outer side. The weave and shape of the individual  5.5.4 OPERATION
            fabric wires permit the water from the jets to penetrate and
            detach the solids mat, which forms on the inside of the screen.  Some operating problems are, depending on the application,
                                                               screen clogging by slimes, iron or magnesium buildups,
                                                               and perhaps oil and grease (Burns and Roe, 1971). Units
            5.5.2 APPLICATIONS
                                                               must be taken out of service on a regular basis for cleaning
            Microscreenshavebeeninusesinceabouttheearly1950s(Burns  when clogging occurs. Cleaning may be done by a chlorine
            and Roe, 1971). Frequent applications have been for algae  solution for slimes, and acid solution for iron or magnesium,
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136