Page 381 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 381

336                            Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological



            operation. Theory provided the rationale for the excursions  where
            from standard designs and pilot plants provided the empirical  C is the concentration of suspended matter of a given
                                                                                             3
            confirmation.                                            species (kg suspended solids=m of water)
                                                                                                             3
                                                                  s is the specific solids deposit on media (kg of solids=m of
            12.3 THEORY                                             total volume of filter)
                                                                  i is the local hydraulic gradient (m headloss=mof filter
            Experimental work aimed at discovering filtration mechan-  depth)
            isms started with Eliassen (1941) reporting on doctoral  Z is the coordinate distance in vertical direction (m)
            research completed at MIT in 1935, followed by Stein  t is the elapsed time since introduction of suspended matter
            (1940), Stanley (1955), and Ives (1961,1962). Filtration the-  to filter medium (s)
            ory, in the mathematical modeling sense, started with a paper
            by Iwasaki (1937) (Section 12.3.3.1). Ives (1962) coupled his  The three functional relations are aspects of the same
            experimental work with mathematical modeling, building on  phenomenon, that is, the loss of a portion of the suspended
            Iwasaki’s work.                                    solids from suspension within the pores of the filter bed, and
                                                               their subsequent deposit on the grains of the filter medium,
                                                               and the ‘‘clogging’’ of the medium that causes increase in
            12.3.1 QUEST OF THEORY
                                                               hydraulic gradient.
            Goals of filtration theory are as follows: (1) to describe vari-
            ables that affect particle removal, (2) to develop mathematical  12.3.1.2  Definitions
            models that describe filtration behavior, and (3) to explain the
                                                               The C(Z) t curve is called here the ‘‘wave front’’; the C(t) Z
            mechanisms of particle removal in depth filtration. Issues  curve is called the ‘‘breakthrough’’ curve; the two curves are
            include the rate of clogging, the rate of headloss increase,  related mathematically. The s(Z) t curve is the ‘‘clogging-
            effluent particle counts with time, backwash effectiveness, etc.  front.’’ The hydraulic gradient profile, i(Z) t is related to the
                                                               clogging-front, which is also related to the wave front.
            12.3.1.1  Dependent Functions in Filtration
            In filtration, the suspended solids concentration and the
            deposited solids both change with depth and with time. At  12.3.2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
            the same time, the local hydraulic gradient changes with  Several experimental investigations have provided data that
            distance and time due to the continuing depositing of solids  describe the filtration process in terms of C(Z, t) results.
            along the depth of the filter column. The respective functional
            relations may be expressed as                      12.3.2.1  Experimental C(Z) t Results of Eliassen
                                                               Figure 12.6a shows experimental C(Z) t curves, that is, ‘‘wave
                                  C(Z, t)               (12:1)  fronts’’ from Eliassen (1941); Figure 12.6b is the first part of
                                                               the associated C(t) Z curve, that is, the ‘‘breakthrough’’ curve,
                                  s(Z, t)               (12:2)
                                                               that is, C(t < 120 h) Z ¼ 60 cm . The Eliassen curves characterize
                                  i(Z, t)               (12:3)  filtration behavior, that is,



               0.50                                                                                       1.0
                                                                 Ottawa silica sand
               0.45                                              d =0.46 mm, UC=1.22                      0.9
                                                                  10
                                                                 e=0.41
               0.40                                                                                       0.8
                                                                 Floc: Fe(OH) 3
               0.35                             v =0.156 cm/h    5 ≤ d(floc) ≤ 25 μm                      0.7
                                                 wf
                                                                                 2
                                                                 v =4.88 m/h (2.0 gpm/ft )                0.6
                       9 h
               0.30
              Iron (ppm)  0.25  36 h  47 h  55 h 70 h  82 h  95 h  109 h  Z o 119 h                       0.5  C/C o
                                                                    (depth)=0.61 m (2.0 ft)
                          23 h
               0.20
                                                                                                          0.3
               0.15                                                                                       0.4
               0.10                                                                                       0.2
               0.05                                                                                       0.1
               0.00                                                                                       0.0
                  0     5    10   15    20   25   30    35   40    45   50    55   60 0  20 40 60 80 100 120
            (a)                                  Z (cm)                              (b)      t (h)
            FIGURE 12.6  Experimental C(Z, t) curves. (a) C(Z) t curves. (b) C(t) Z¼Z o  curve. (Adapted from Eliassen, R., J. Am. Water Works Assoc.,
            33(5), 936, 1941.)
   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386