Page 771 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 771

726                            Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological




                      BOX 23.1   ERMAN PEARSON
                                                                  was a lucid exposition of activated-sludge reactor the-
              Anaerobic treatment has had fewer adherents than has  ory incorporating Michaelis–Menten kinetics with
              activated-sludge. While the latter had the proverbial thou-  materials-balance, showing derivative parameters such
              sand papers by the 1970s the anaerobic field just started to  as substrate removal velocity, U, sludge age, u c , net
              flower in the late 1950s. The anaerobic process is more  growth rate, and nutrient removal. I asked him how he
              complex and requires a great deal of persistence; every-  got into activated-sludge theory. He remarked that when
              thing is more difficult. One of a handful of academics who  he was invited to lecture on the topic at Texas and
              pursued this field, along with a number of able graduate  started preparing he saw that ‘‘everyone had been flying
              students, was Professor Erman Pearson (1920–1985).  in the wrong direction.’’ His paper was to ‘‘try to set
                 Iknew him first in 1953 as an undergraduate student in  things straight.’’ The statement illustrated both his sense
              two of his courses; he was always well prepared and  of humor and, most likely, his frank assessment. The
              articulate and transmitted volumes of basic and lasting  texas paper had outlined the basics of modern theory,
              knowledge on water supply and sewerage. As under-   and was a culmination of research that started with
              graduates we did not know of his other life as a researcher  Andrew Gram in 1956, but with most of his doctroal
              and as a leader in the field. I became familiar with these  students working on anaerobic topics. The transition to
              aspects in 1965 after getting my doctorate. The first thing  activated sludge theory was not an issue since the prin-
              I learned was that with Harvey Ludwig and about 20  ciples of biological growth and reactor theory are com-
              professors, he was the instigator and first president of  mon to both aerobic and anaerobic treatment.
              Association of Environmental Engineering and Science  In addition to his research and leadership roles, he was
              Professors (AEESP), formed in 1963. As with all of his  a noted consultant and advisor to the State of California,
              compatriots, he had a presence when in a room, due to his  which had advanced programs in pollution control.
              size, his wit, and his incisive remarks. About the same  Although teaching itself has not too much recognition,
              time, 1960, he was helping to form what is now the  he was a dedicated to this role, for both undergraduate
              International Water Association (IWA). The first biennial  and graduate areas. The field of environmental engineer-
              conference was in London in 1962, the second in Tokyo in  ing has had, perhaps, more than its share of outstanding
              1964, the third in Munich in 1966, and the fourth in  professionals, many who were and are known for their
              Prague in 1968. Professor Pearson followed Professor  own unique character traits. Professor Pearson stood out
              Eckenfelder as its third president, 1966–1968.      as a professional and as a personality.



                                                               23.2.2.1  Materials Balance
                                                               A materials-balance statement for a reactor is merely a way to
                                                               account for all the happenings within its volume (see also
                                                               Chapter 4). The general statement is
                                                                 accumulated net changes
                                                                   ¼ materials inflow   materials outflow

                                                                     þ rate of production or depletion of material
                                                                     within the reactor:                   (23:2)

                                                                  The material being accounted for may be anything of
              Professor Erman Pearson, c.1960. (Courtesy of Department of
                                                               interest. For the case of activated sludge, the materials of
              Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California,
                                                               interest are substrate and cells.
              Berkeley, CA.)
                                                               Procedure. The basic technique of analysis is to (1) sketch the
                 The first issue of Water Research, 1(1), January
                                                               system being analyzed, (2) draw a circle around the portion of
              1967 lists the governing board members, with an edi-
                                                               the system of interest, and (3) write a materials-balance equa-
              torial by Pearson. Dr. Samuel H. Jenkins was one of the
                                                               tion for the portion circumscribed.
              founders and the executive editor. Professor Ecken-
              felder and a number of academics from countries world-  Homogeneous volume. The most important concern in
              wide were also founders.                         applying Equation 23.2 is that the contents of the volume
                 One of Professor Pearson’s seminal contributions  being analyzed must be homogeneous. If the volume being
              was a 1967 paper at a University of Texas lecture series,  considered is not homogeneous, then it must be broken down
              later published in a book (Pearson, 1968). His paper  into homogeneous subunits. Or, for the purposes of an analy-
                                                               sis, it is assumed to be homogeneous.
   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776