Page 289 - gas transport in porous media
P. 289

286
                              Table 16.3. List of input parameters for model Barosolv
                              Porosity = 0.4         Well radius = 1.27 cm              Rossabi
                              Gas phase saturation (S g ) = 0.25  Depth of well = 32.2 m
                                                     Depth of water table = 39.6 m
                              Average pressure = 100.4 kPa  Calibrated vertical permeability (k z ) = 2.4E-13m 2
                              Differential pressure data continuously logged at 10 minute intervals from 3/18/94 to 4/25/94.



                                               Comparison of measured and modeled flow data
                                                    (Using only surface pressure data)
                                  25
                                       kr = 40 Darcy
                                  20

                                  15
                                  10

                                   5
                                Flow (lpm)  –5 0




                                 –10

                                 –15
                                                                                Field data
                                 –20                                           Surface P model
                                 –25
                                    0           5          10          15         20
                                                          Time (days)

                           Figure 16.3.  Comparison of field measured and computer modeled flow data using measured surface
                           pressure as model input


                           pressure prediction, the flow prediction is accurate but misses some of the more
                           dynamic flow behavior. Eq. (16.13) was then used with the measured differential
                           pressure data to compare the amount of error introduced by model predicted pressure
                           differential. Figure 16.4 shows a comparison between field measured and model
                           predicted subsurface flow using Eq. (16.13) with measured differential pressure as
                           the input data. The other input parameters were identical to those used for the model
                           in Figure 16.3 and are listed in Table 16.4.
                             The sum of squared errors (SSE) between the field measured flows and the
                           flows predicted by modeling measured differential pressure and predicted differen-
                           tial pressure (based on surface pressure) were compared. The SSE from the measured
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294