Page 164 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 164

Analysis of Geologic Controls on Mineral Occurrence                  165

           2.  Discretise or classify the map of distances to geological features into a number of
              classes.  A classification  using narrow equal intervals of percentiles  or cumulative
              proportions of distances is advisable. That is because the type (i.e.,  normal, log-
              normal, etc.) of empirical density distribution  of  distances to a set  of geological
              features is usually unknown but percentiles of the distance data are robust for
              classification and directly represent the cumulative proportions of distances sought in
              the distance distribution analysis.
           3.  In the attribute table associated with classified map of distances to  geological
              features, perform the following table operations (see Fig. 6-8).
              a.  Determine the upper limit of each distance (buffer) class. In some cases, this
                 variable is already given in the attribute table associated with a classified map of
                 distances to geological features.
              b.  Determine the number (or frequency) of pixels (npixd) in each distance class. In
                 many cases, this variable is already given in the attribute table associated with a
                 classified map of distances to geological features.
              c.  Determine the cumulative number (or cumulative frequency) of distance class
                 pixels (npixp) in the order of increasing distances.
              d.  Determine the total number of pixels (npixt).
              e.  Determine  Ê(X) by dividing values of  npixp with the value of  npixt. As
                 shown in Fig. 6-8, values of Ê(X) are stored in column propr (which stands for
                 cumulative proportion of ‘random’ points) of the attribute table. Note that, in
                 principle, a very large number of random points must be generated to properly
                 estimate Ê(X). Note also that any one of all the pixels in a map could probably
                 represent a random point (or a Poisson process), so that (i) each pixel in a map
                 represents a Euclidean distance  E(X) to its nearest geological features and (ii)
                 using all pixels (i.e., npixt) leads to a reasonable estimate of the cumulative
                 frequency distribution  of expected  distances  Ê(X)  from  a set of linear features
                 under examination (Bonham-Carter, 1994, pp. 163-164).
           4.  Perform a cross or intersect or zonal statistics operation using the classified map of
              distances to a set of geological features and a map of the locations (or occurrences) of
              mineral deposits of the type sought.
           5.  Join the  geo-information of number (or  frequency) of  deposit pixels contained in
              certain classes of distances from the cross table output to the attribute table of the
              map of classified  distances of a set  of  geological features.  Note that the cross
              operation functions (i) to determine the Euclidean distance [i.e., O(X)] between each
              deposit pixel and then (ii) to classify the values of O(X) in the same way as the values
              of E(X) were classified.
           6.  In the attribute table of the map of classified distances of a set of geological features,
              perform further the following table operation (see Fig. 6-8).
              a.  Determine the cumulative number (or cumulative frequency) of deposit pixels
                 (npixpd) contained in every distance (buffer) class in the order of increasing
                 distance.
              b.  Determine the total number of deposit pixels (npixtd).
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169