Page 169 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 169

170                                                             Chapter 6



















             Fig. 6-11. (A) Graphs of cumulative proportions of distance buffer pixels and epithermal Au
             deposit pixels around northeast (NE) trending faults/fractures, Aroroy district (Philippines).
             Confidence band is for α=0.05. (B) Corresponding graph of β-statistic of difference (D) between
             the cumulative proportion curves.


             source controls (aside from  being plausible structural controls) on the occurrence  of
             epithermal Au mineralisations in the Aroroy district.
                In contrast to NNW- and NW-trending faults/fractures and to intersections of NNW-
             and NW-trending  faults/fractures, northeast (NE) trending faults/fractures in the case
             study area do not exhibit statistically significant (at α=0.25)  positive spatial association
             with occurrences of epithermal Au deposits (Fig. 6-11). Although it seems that, based on
             the D and β curves, the epithermal Au deposit occurrences in the area are preferentially
             located within 0.25  km of NE-trending faults/fractures, the results suggest that
             epithermal Au deposits in the case study area are almost randomly distributed around
             NE-trending  faults/fractures because the  ‘deposit’ curve closely follows the ‘buffer’
             curve. These results are, nevertheless, consistent with the results of the Fry analysis (Fig.
             6-6), which  do not show  NE trends in the spatial distribution  of the  occurrences  of
             epithermal  Au deposits. Thus, NE-trending  faults/fractures do not  constitute  a
             satisfactory spatial evidence of prospectivity for epithermal Au deposits in the case study
             area.
                The distance distribution method can also be applied to determine spatial associations
             between occurrences of mineral deposits of the type sought and geochemical anomalies.
             Whereas the application of the distance distribution method to geological features such
             as faults/fractures is an ascending approach (i.e., increasing distances, from minimum to
             maximum, are used in the analysis), the application of the distance distribution method
             to geochemical anomalies is a descending approach  (i.e., decreasing geochemical
             attributes, from maximum to minimum, are used in the analysis), because prospective
             areas for mineral deposits of the type sought are invariably characterised  by high
             concentrations of elements or metals associated  with the  deposits.  The analysis  is
             demonstrated  here  using the following three sets of  derivative stream sediment
             geochemical data (SSGD) representing anomalous multi-element associations: (1) the
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174