Page 244 - Glucose Monitoring Devices
P. 244

248    CHAPTER 12 Modeling the CGM measurement error




                         Characterization of recalibrated synchronized sensor errors
                         In this section, we study the third component of sensor difference from reference,
                         which remains after recalibration and synchronization of sensor and reference
                         data. We refer to this difference as the sensor error. To study more precisely the
                         sensor error and its time dependence, we used dataset 2, which contains YSI glucose
                         measurements taken at 15-min intervals.
                            The histogram of the sensor error is presented in Fig. 12.4. The sensor error has a
                         mean of 0.76 mg/dL and a standard deviation of 11 mg/dL, but its skewness and kur-
                         tosis show that the distribution of the error is not normal. To estimate its distribution,
                         we used the Johnson family and obtained the parameters in Table 12.1.
                            To characterize the time dependency of the sensor error we computed the ACF
                         and PACF of the sensor error as described in the Methods section. As the reference
                         glucose measures were equally spaced at 15 min, the lags are integer multiples of
                         15 min. The results of this analysis are presented in Fig. 12.5. Using a significance
                         bound based on the 95% confidence interval for Gaussian white noise processes, we
                         conclude that sensor noise is highly correlated across time up to several hours. The
                         lag of autocorrelation depends on each sensor (Fig. 12.5A), but, in general, sensor
                         noise is best predicted by a linear combination of the sensor noise 15 min earlier
                         and a random white noise term (PACF cutting off after lag 1 in Fig. 12.5B).
































                         FIGURE 12.4
                         Histogram of sensor error with the fitted normal distribution (green) and the fitted Johnson
                         distribution (red).
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249