Page 36 - Handbook of Surface Improvement and Modification
P. 36

2.2 Methods of testing                                                31


                Nano-indenters  with  a  horizontal  tip  movement  capability  are  frequently  used  in
                        1
                                                     1
            scratch testing.  The tips are pyramidal or conical.  The pyramidal tip has sharp corners,
                                                                           1
            resulting in significant stress concentration and a complex stress distribution.  A conical
                                              1
            tip is better due to its circular projection.  Considering that the conical tip is small, the
            contact stress is extremely high resulting in a rapid failure which makes it difficult to
                                                1
            observe transitions in deformation behavior.  For this reason, expensive analysis equip-
                                1
            ment is usually required.
                A practical methodology was developed and standardized by ASTM (D7027-13) and
                           1
            ISO (19252:2008).  The test involves application of a progressive normal load at a con-
                                                 stant rate using a 1 mm diameter spherical
                                                 tip (simulates the surface scratching with a
                                                         1
                                                 car  key).  The geometry of tip permits
                                                 more  effective  examination  of  scratch
                                                 behavior  than  with  pyramid  or  conical
                                                         1
                                                 indenters.  The results of the test simulate
                                                 real-life surface damage at a similar length
                                                      1
                                                 scale.  Because the applied load is known,
                                                 the applied stress can be approximated with
                                                 finite element methods, providing the cor-
                                                 responding mechanistic information of the
                                                                1
                                                 scratch   process.    The   methodology
                                                 employs a variety of microscopy tools for
                                                 detailed description of deformation mecha-
            Figure 2.23. Scratch tester. [Adapted, by permission,   nisms and an assessment of scratch visibil-
            from Sangermano, M; Messori, M, Macromol. Mater.
            Eng., 295, 603-12, 2010.]            ity using a commercially available software
                                                 package  called  Automatic  Scratch  Visual-
                  1
            ization.  The software uses physiological parameters to simulate the human eye perception
                      1
            of a scratch.  The Scratch 5 is a research grade polymer, coatings, films, and bulk materi-
            als tribology instrument, capable of exploring scratch, mar, and other surface properties in
                                     47
            a rigorous and meaningful way.  It replicates a variety of industry standards (e.g., 5-Fin-
                                 47
            ger, Erichsen cross-hatch).
                Figure 2.23 shows a scratch tester which was used in evaluation of scratch resistance
                                       48
            enhancement of polymer coatings.  A scratch experiment is performed in three stages: an
                                                           48
            original profile, a scratch segment, and a residual profile.  The penetration depth of the
            indenter  is estimated by comparing the indenter displacement normal to the surface dur-
            ing scratching with the altitude of the original surface, at each position along the scratch
                 48
            length.  Roughness and slope of the surface are taken into account in the calculation of
                                48
            the indenter penetration.  Two different critical loads are defined which correspond to
                                           48
            failure and detachment of the coating.  The fracture events can be visible on both the
                                               48
            microscope view and the penetration curves.
                The ISO standard suggests conducting the mar test as follows: The paint or coating is
            applied onto flat panels, dried/cured, and subjected to the mar resistance determination by
            pushing the panels beneath a curved (loop-shaped or ring-shaped) stylus which is mounted
            in such a manner that it presses down on the surface of the test panel at an angle of 45°. 49
                                                         49
            The load is increased in steps until the coating is marred.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41