Page 269 - Hydrogeology Principles and Practice
P. 269

HYDC07  12/5/05  5:32 PM  Page 252






                 252    Chapter Seven



                                                                                             BO X
                  Continued
                                                                                             7. 1

                                         −7
                                                                                 ××
                                                                                        ×
                  Q = 1200 × bq = 1200 × 10 × 1 × 10 ms −1      23  × 12  −3  2 25 1  −3    . 3 1536    × 10 7
                                                                 .   .    × 10
                                                                               .     10
                                                               =
                                                             s             log
                                                                                         ×
                                                                   ××
                          −3
                                                                    1
                             3 −1
                    = 1.2 × 10 m s or 1.2 L s −1        eq. 2    4p      10 −3  10  . 0 075 2  × 2 10 −4
                                                               = 2.37 m                            eq. 4
                  The location of the extraction well is identified by copying directly
                  from the position of the well on the type curves to the site map
                  at the matching point, as indicated in Fig. 1. To check that this  This is an acceptable drawdown but, for the required discharge rate, 3
                                                                                                   6
                  pumping rate produces an acceptable water level drawdown at the  the time required to remove the estimated volume of 2.92 × 10 m
                                                                                         −1
                  well, then with a chosen well radius, r , of 0.075 m, the following  of contaminated water from within the 10 mgL contour line of the
                                          w
                  non-equilibrium radial flow equation (see eq 5.40) can be applied  plume (for an aquifer porosity of 0.20) is 77 years, assuming that
                                                                                         −1
                  for large values of time, t, of say 1 year:  no water with a concentration below 10 mgL  is extracted by the
                                                             well. Therefore, the pump-and-treat system will require a long
                    =
                   s    . 23 Q  log 10  . 225 Tt        eq. 3  investment of time, ongoing maintenance and water treatment
                             2
                     4p T    rS                              costs, and substantial energy inputs to maintain this remediation
                             w
                                                             approach.
                  which, on substitution of the above values gives:
                 the upper end of the plume in order to force the con-  method often effectively shrinks the plume towards
                 taminated water towards the extraction well, and so  its source, but for the shrinkage to persist it is neces-
                 shorten the total clean-up time of the aquifer.  sary for pumping to continue. However, the long-
                   Limitations of the above analytical method are the  term cost of such pumping becomes expensive and
                 basic assumptions of a homogeneous and isotropic  without sufficient detail concerning the mass of
                 aquifer and a fully penetrating well open over the  NAPL and its distribution at or below the water table
                 entire thickness of the aquifer. The method can be  in heterogeneous aquifer material, then it becomes
                 applied to unconfined aquifers where the amount of  difficult to predict reliably the time necessary for
                 drawdown relative to the total saturated thickness of  permanent clean-up. Hence, groundwater remedia-
                 the aquifer is small, but in heterogeneous aquifers  tion by pump-and-treat may last for a very long time.
                 such as fluvial deposits with low permeability clay  It is these shortcomings that have provided a strong
                 lenses and high permeability gravel beds, the technique  incentive for the development of alternative remedia-
                 may give erroneous results.                 tion technologies, such as passive treatment using
                   An example of the successful application of the  permeable reactive barriers.
                 pump-and-treat method for groundwater remedia-
                 tion is described in Box 7.2 for an airport site that
                 experienced a leak of kerosene. This example of  7.2.2 Permeable reactive barriers
                 organic contamination is common worldwide but
                 it is now recognized that non-aqueous phase liquids  Following recognition that the pump-and-treat
                 (NAPLs), such as oil products and organic solvents,  approach can prove expensive and in many cases
                 are not treated satisfactorily by the pump-and-treat  ineffective, research since the late 1980s has focused
                 approach. In a review of the technology, Mackay and  on alternative, in situ approaches such as permeable
                 Cherry (1989) considered that the rate of contamin-  reactive barriers (PRBs). In outline, PRBs are con-
                 ant mass removal by extraction wells is exceedingly  structed by excavating a portion of the aquifer and
                 slow compared with the often large mass of the con-  then replacing the material excavated with a perme-
                 taminant source. In such cases, the pump-and-treat  able mixture designed to react with the contaminant.
                 option is best considered as a method of hydraulic  Typically, PRBs are installed in trenches, but barriers
                 manipulation of the aquifer to prevent continua-  have also been constructed by jetting reactive mater-
                 tion of contaminant migration. The pump-and-treat  ials into the ground, or by generating fractures within
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274