Page 271 - Hydrogeology Principles and Practice
P. 271

HYDC07  12/5/05  5:32 PM  Page 254







                                                                                             BO X
                  Continued
                                                                                             7. 2

                    Groundwater levels were monitored regularly, and within 2  that Well 3 tapped a ‘pool’ of kerosene isolated from the effects of
                  months the cone of depression in the water table produced by the  Wells 1 and 2 by the foundations of the Technical Blocks. A further
                  pumping of Wells 1 and 2 encompassed the estimated area of the  10,100 L of kerosene were removed from Well 3 (Fig. 3), making a
                  kerosene ‘pancake’. Initially, the recovery rate was such that 19,200  total recovery of 29,300 L of kerosene in 4 years at which point the
                  L of kerosene were removed (Fig. 3) and sold to be blended into  removal of the original kerosene ‘pancake’ was considered to be
                  commercial heating oil. The recovery rate then dropped substan-  complete. Although active remediation by pump-and-treat ended at
                  tially, yet the kerosene layer in borehole 11 still remained unaltered,  this time, kerosene recovery using passive collectors, for example
                  suggesting that Wells 1 and 2 were not affecting the southern part  absorbent mops, in the three wells continued for about another year.
                  of the kerosene ‘pancake’. Later, Well 3 was installed. It is believed  The clean-up project officially ended in 1994 (Clark & Sims 1998).































                  Fig. 2 Construction details of recovery Well 2. The well was installed by excavating a pit by back-hoe as deeply as possible, about 2 m
                  below the water table, lowering the perforated concrete rings into position and then backfilling around the rings using the gravel
                  excavated from the pit. After Clark and Sims (1998).

                    20000
                    18000
                    16000
                   Cumulative recovery (litres)  12000  • •  • • • • •  •  •  •  • •  •  •  •
                    14000

                    10000
                     8000
                     6000
                                                 • • • • • •  • • • • • • • • • • • •  Wells 1 and 2
                     4000                       • •        •  Well 3        Fig. 3 Cumulative recovery of
                                                • • •                       hydrocarbon from Wells 1, 2 and 3 at
                     2000                      • • • • •
                                              • •                           Heathrow Airport during clean-up of
                       0                   • • •  • • • • • • •             the gravel aquifer. After Clark and
                                1989        1990       1991        1992     Sims (1998).
   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276