Page 214 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 214

Machinery Reliability Audits and Reviews   185

                    Cf: The surface-condition factor takes into account tooth surface finish and resid-
                       ual  stress. Generally,  it is taken  as  1. However,  it may  go to about  1.25 for
                       rough finishes that would cause localized contacts, or when residual stresses
                       are expected to be high or unpredictable. Both conditions can warrant a value
                       as high as 1 SO; this would derate gear life about 35 times.
                    Cm: The load  distribution  factor  allows  for anything  that  might prevent  100%
                        gear-tooth contact: lead and profile errors, stiffness of gears and mountings,
                        deviations from true alignment of  the gear axis, and uneven thermal expan-
                        sion during operation. If all such conditions were ideal, C,  would be 1 .00; but
                        practical conditions may drive this value to 3.00 or more. For a value of 3.00,
                        gear life would be derated 1,530 times.
                         Experience shows that wide-face gears require special considerations to off-
                       set net misalignment and to obtain good load distribution at full torque. Gener-
                       ally, a face width equal to the pinion diameter is the best compromise.
                         It should be remembered that misalignment cannot be readily absorbed by
                       the gear teeth except through plastic deformation, which is difficult to predict
                       in  terms of  life. Extreme profile modifications  in a helical mesh can reduce
                       instantaneous lines of contact to nearly point contacts; this is as bad as severe
                       misalignment. Usually  a few  ten  thousandths  addendum relief  is enough  to
                       assure a smooth load transfer from tooth to tooth.

                    The combined derating factor Cd could reasonably vary from  1.00 to 20.25, with
                   the latter reducing life about 2.87 x 10"  times. AGMA Standard 41 1.02 is very help-
                   ful in  determining  limits for Cd. Table 3-18, taken from AGMA  Standard 41 1.02,
                   gives derating factors for aircraft-quality gears: these may be used as guides in estab-
                   lishing minimum limits for Cd for any quality level. From a practical point of  view,
                   quality speed-increasing gears supplied to the petrochemical  industry for turboma-
                   chiiiery drives most often exhibit life-cycle characteristics relating to a Cd of approx-
                   imately 2.0. For double-helical gears using turbine oil as a mesh lubricant, N,  should
                   be calculated on the basis of this derating factor.




                                               Table 3-18
                              Derating Factor Cd for Aircraft and Helical Gears*
                   -
                                                   AGMA Gear Quality Number
                   Application                 9        IO       11       12
                    ~    ____~~
                   Main propulsion
                    drive gears
                     Continuous                -        1.8      1.5      1.2
                     Takeoff                   -        1.5      I .2     I .o
                   Power-takeoff
                    gears                      2.4      2.1      1.8      I .5
                     Auxiliary power
                     supply units              -        2. I     I .8     1.5
                   *Source: AGMA. By pentiissioti.
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219