Page 134 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 134

L1644_C03.fm  Page 108  Tuesday, October 21, 2003  3:11 PM









                                A quantitative multicriteria assessment is based on weighting factors established
                             by the explicit weighting of the impact potentials.
                                In the event, an important point about LCA application must be remarked no
                             matter which interpretation method is selected.  This methodology is a powerful
                             instrument of support regarding the evaluation of environmental and human health
                             impacts; however, in many cases its results can be useful without an appreciation
                             of the reliability and validity of the information. In this framework, a quantitative
                             sensitivity analysis must be performed to assess the effect of the key assumptions
                             on the final results, to check the data whose quality is suspected or unknown, to
                             show if the study results are highly dependent on particular sets of inputs, and to
                             evaluate life-cycle effects of changes being considered (Consoli et al., 1993).
                                Conclusions should only be drawn on study results with consideration of the
                             data variability and resulting variability of the findings. Chapter 5 will discuss this
                             subject more thoroughly and present alternative methods to carry out a qualitative
                             sensitivity analysis.


                             3.10  EXAMPLE: COMPARISON OF PET AND GLASS FOR
                                 MINERAL WATER BOTTLES
                             This example addresses the question of what is better from an environmental point
                             of view: consuming mineral water in nonreturnable small plastic bottles made of
                             PET or in returnable glass bottles. For the sake of simplicity, as parameter for the
                             comparison, only the greenhouse effect (GWP) is to be considered. The basis of the
                             calculation is 1 L of mineral water consumed in small bottles. Calculations must be
                             made taking into account the life-cycle of the two types of bottles and the environ-
                             mental load of water and bottle transportation. The following assumptions are con-
                             sidered:

                                •  In the case of the plastic bottles, the impact related to bottle manufacturing
                                   is not taken into account. The same holds for transportation because the
                                   bottles are manufactured in the bottling plant. Empty glass bottles are
                                   delivered from the glass factory in 16-t trucks.
                                •  The bottled water is delivered from the bottling plant to the wholesaler
                                   in 16-t trucks and from the wholesaler to the retail trader by van. The
                                   glass bottles are returned by van to the wholesaler and from the wholesaler
                                   to the bottle manufacturer in 16-t trucks.
                                •  The impact of cleaning the bottles is not considered.

                                For the calculations the following data must be used:
                                                                        PET           Glass
                             Bottle weight (g)                          20            237
                             Bottle capacity (L)                         0.33          0.25
                             Number of uses                              1             20
                             Distance from bottling plant to wholesaler (km)  50       50
                             Distance from wholesaler to retail trader (km)  20        20
                             Distance from bottle manufacturer to bottling plant (km)  —  100



                             © 2004 CRC Press LLC
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139