Page 221 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 221

L1644_C05.fm  Page 194  Monday, October 20, 2003  12:02 PM











                                     TABLE 5.10
                                     Uncertainties in Measurements of Emissions in ETH Process Modules a

                                                Parameter types          Distribution type  Uncertainty (CV)
                                     Substances determined stochiometrically (CO 2 )  Normal  0.02
                                     Actual emission measurements or emissions of   Normal   0.10
                                      well-known processes depending on multiple
                                      parameters (CO, NO x , SO 2 )
                                     Well-defined substances or sum parameters (As,   Normal  0.20
                                      Cd, HCl, HMs, Ni, PCDD/Fs)
                                     Specific compounds with elaborated analytical   Normal   0.30
                                      methods (PM)
                                     a According to Meier, M., Eco-Efficiency Evaluation of Waste Gas Purification Systems in the Chemical
                                     Industry, LCA Documents, Vol. 2, Ecomed Publishers, Landsberg, Germany, 1997, and Frischknecht,
                                     R. et al.,  Ökoinventare von Energiesystemen  — Grundlagen für den  ökologischen Vergleich  von
                                     Energiesystemen und den Einbezug von Energiesystemen in Ökobilanzen für die Schweiz. 3rd ed.,
                                     ETH Zürich: Gruppe Energie-Stoffe-Umwelt, PSI Villigen: Sektion Ganzheitliche Systemanalysen,
                                     1996.
                                     CV = coefficient of variation.

                                       For a better understanding of these estimates, Table 5.10 specifies which pol-
                                    lutant emission corresponds to which class under study. In addition, an example of
                                    the life-cycle data for the input flow of energy consumption in Spain is presented.
                                    According to this scheme, CO  is the only environmental load that has been deter-
                                                            2
                                    mined stochiometrically for all life-cycle data. As a result of using this relatively
                                    certain assessment method, CO   received a CV of 2%. CO, NO   and SO   were
                                                                                                  2
                                                              2
                                                                                          x
                                    considered to be obtained by actual emission measurements or to be computed in
                                    well-known process simulations depending on multiple parameters. Because of more
                                    possibilities for errors, a CV of 10% was assumed for all of these compounds. For
                                    well-defined substances or summed parameters such as HM, PCDD/Fs and HCl, a
                                    CV of 20%  was established. Finally, in the class for specific compounds with
                                    elaborated analytical methods, the uncertainty level was considered the highest with
                                    a CV of 30%. In the present case study, this CV was assumed for the life-cycle
                                    database information on particulate matter.

                                    5.8.1.2  Assessing Uncertainties and Variations in the
                                            Calculation of LCI
                                    Following the procedure related to uncertainty assessment for the proposed LCI, a
                                    Monte Carlo simulation was run for each situation with the probability distribution
                                    described previously. Its  final result consisted of a set of histograms  — one per
                                    selected pollutant — corresponding to the two scenarios proposed in the study: 1)
                                    Scenario 1: former situation and 2) Scenario 2: current situation.
                                       Current situation (Scenario 2) refers to the incineration process carried out with
                                    an advanced acid gas treatment system (AGTS). On the other hand, in Scenario 1


                                    © 2004 CRC Press LLC
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226