Page 131 - Integrated Wireless Propagation Models
P. 131

I
                          M a c r o c e  I   P r e d i c t i o n  M o d e I s - P a r t  2 :  P o i n t - t o - P o i n t  M o d e I s   109
               3.1.2.3.2   Calculating  Effective Antenna  Height  Gain  The effective antenna height gain
               calculation considers the terrain contour and the relation of effective antenna height (he)
               to the standard condition antenna height (h1) of 100 feet (-30.5 m). The Lee model con­
               siders four different cases: (1) terrain sloping is upward when he > hl'  (2) over a flat ter­
               rain when he > hl'  (3) terrain sloping is downward when he < hl'  and ( 4) over a flat terrain
               when he < h1• These cases are illustrated in Figs. 3.1.2.3.1 and 3.1.2.3.2.
                  The formula of the effective antenna height gain from the Lee model is shown in
               Eq. (3.1.2.3) when the actual antenna height is the same as the standard antenna height
               (h; = h1) as follows:

                                                                                (3 1 . 2.3.1)
                                                                                 .

                    1 .   For these two cases (for a terrain sloping upward and for a flat terrain when
                      he > h1), Eq. (3.1.2.3.1) results in a positive gain (G effi'  > 0 dB).
                    2.  For these two cases (for a terrain sloping downward and for a flat terrain when
                      he < h1), Eq. (3.1.2.3.1) results in a negative gain (Ge ' < 0 dB). If he < hJ10, then
                                                                f fi
                                        /
                      he is forced to cap at h 1 0.
                  Figure 3.1.2.3.3 illustrates the path loss prediction that is obtained based on the
               area-to-area path loss curve, adding or subtracting the effective antenna height gain at
               each local point due to the influence of the local terrain contour; as a result, the overall
               point-to-point signal strength prediction is plotted for each local point along the mobile
               path. Note that the variation in prediction can be significant, as shown at points D
               through G in the figure.




                  Geffh  > 0  i
                                h

                  for terrain   h e
                 sloping up

                                        .,.,...                   Diffuse reflection point (R 1 )
                                    ..,.....                  •
                                 .,.,...                      •   Specular reflection point (R2)
                              v                             --- Direct wave
                                                            - - - Specular wave
                                                            -·· ···· ·····   Diffuse wave
                                h ,
                                 l
                 Ge ffh  > 0 for   h e
                 flat terrain
                when h e > h 1





               FIGURE 3.1.2.3.1  Effective a n tenna height gain (Getth)-positive gai n .
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136