Page 244 - MEMS Mechanical Sensors
P. 244

9.4 Force Transfer Flow Sensors                                               233

            Table 9.4  Data for Pressure Difference Type Flow Sensors
            Author; Year   Flow Range   Sensitivity     Response Time Fluid      Chip Size
            Cho et al. [81];  0.001–4 Torr  200 ppm/mTorr  —         Nitrogen    9.7 × 3mm 2
            1991
            Nishimoto et al.  0–800 µl/min  0.5 (µV/V)/(µl/min)  —   Water       —
            [86]; 1994
            Oosterbroek et al. 0–4.5 l/s  —             —            Water       10 × 5mm 2
            [82, 83]; 1997,
            1999
            Berbering et al.  0–23 m/s  —               —            Air         8 × 5 × 1.4
            [87]; 1998                                                           mm 3
            Richter et al. [84]; 2–32 ml/min  —         1 ms         Water       —
            1999
            Kuoni et al. [85];  30–300 µl/h  —          —            Water       —
            2003





                  In-Plane Drag Force Flow Sensors  Gass et al. [88], Nishimoto et al. [85], and Zhang et
                  al. [89] presented in-plane paddle flow sensors (Figure 9.24). Zhang proposed that their
                  sensor can have two working modes: drag force and pressure difference. Simulation
                  showed that drag force mode is more suitable for small flow rates (e.g., below 10 µl/min
                  for water) and pressure difference is more suitable for high flow rates (e.g., above 100
                  µl/min for water) [85]. The pressure difference mode is feasible due to the pressure drop
                  through the small gap around the paddle at high flow rates (Figure 9.24), since the
                  pressure drop increases with increasing flow rate. However, the high pressure drop is a
                  disadvantage if the sensor is to be used with other devices as mentioned above. Other
                  disadvantages of this type of flow sensor setup are the disturbance of the flow profile,
                  the sensitivity to particles, and the fragility of the paddle suspension.

                  Out-of-Plane Drag Force Flow Sensors  Su et al. [90], Ozaki et al. [91], Fan et al. [92,
                  93], and Chen et al. [66] discuss out-of-plane drag force flow sensors, thereby avoiding
                  the high pressure drop. The sensor described by Su et al. employs a paddle suspended on
                  two beams [Figure 9.25(a)]. The beams and the paddle are only 2.5 µm thick, and
                  therefore, a high sensitivity is achieved. The air flow sensor by Ozaki et al. is modeled on
                  wind receptor hair of insects. Structures are designed as one-dimensional [Figure
                  9.26(a)] and two-dimensional sensors [Figure 9.26(b)]. The angle of attack could be
                  sensed with the two-dimensional arrangement. In this case, a thin long wire (dimensions


                                                            Flow

                                          Piezoresistive
                                          elements
                                                        Paddle







                  Figure 9.24  Schematic of in-plane drag force flow sensors. Zhang et al. [89] use a 10-µm-thick
                                                                              2
                                           2
                  cantilever beam (100 × 124 µm ) attached to a square paddle (500 × 500 µm ). A narrow gap
                  (200 mm) around the cantilever paddle forms a flow channel. The size of the cantilever beam for
                                                   2
                  the sensor by Gass et al. [88] was 1× 3 µm with a thickness of 10 µm.
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249