Page 309 - Machine Learning for Subsurface Characterization
P. 309

Classification of sonic wave Chapter  9 271


             Soft voting can lead to different decision as compared with hard voting. Soft
             voting entails computing a weighed sum of the predicted probabilities of all
             models for each class. Hard voting uses predicted class labels for majority rule
             voting, which is a simple majority vote for accuracy. For example, a voting clas-
             sifier ensembles three classifiers. When the individual classifiers 1, 2, and 3 pre-
             dict Class Y, Class N, and Class N, respectively, hard voting will lead to Class N
             as the ensemble decision because 2/3 classifiers predict the Class N. When the
             individual classifiers 1, 2, and 3 predict Class Y with probability of 90%, 45%,
             and 36%, soft voting will lead to final prediction of Class Y because the average
             probability is (90 + 45 + 36)/3 ¼ 57%. Soft voting can improve on hard voting
             because it takes into account more information; it uses each classifier’s uncer-
             tainty in the final decision. We use hard voting in this study.



             5  Results for the classification-based noninvasive
             characterization of static mechanical discontinuities
             in materials

             5.1 Characterization of material containing static discontinuities
             of various dispersions around the primary orientation

             5.1.1 Background
             In this section, nine classifiers (discussed in Section 4.1) process compressional
             wavefront travel times to categorize materials containing discontinuities in
             terms of the dispersion around the primary orientation. The von Mises distribu-
             tion is used to generate 100 discontinuities with various dispersions around a
             primary orientation. The von Mises probability density function for the orien-
             tation of discontinuity can be expressed as [19]
                                             e kcos x μÞ
                                                 ð
                                    fxj μ,kÞ ¼                          (9.8)
                                     ð
                                              2πI 0 kðÞ
             where x is the orientation of discontinuity, μ is the mode of the orientations of
             the discontinuities, k is the concentration (inverse of dispersion) of the orienta-
             tions around the mode, and I 0 is the modified Bessel function of order 0. The
             distribution is clustered around μ and the dispersion around the mode is
             expressed as 1/k. The dispersion 1/k controls the deviation of the orientations
             around the mode μ. Mode and dispersion (1/k) are statistical parameters of
             the von Mises distribution analogous to mean and standard deviation of Gauss-
             ian distribution. von Mises distribution is an approximation to the wrapped nor-
             mal distribution resulting from the “wrapping” of a normal distribution around a
             unit circle. Three types of material containing discontinuities are generated with
             concentration parameter (k) of 0, 5, and 1000 (Fig. 9.22).
                Fig. 9.22 illustrates the materials containing discontinuities (upper row) and
             the corresponding distribution of dispersion around the primary orientation of
   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314