Page 302 - Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction
P. 302

274   •  Chapter 8  /  Failure

            Figure 8.20  Maximum stress (S)  versus   700
            logarithm of the number of cycles to
            fatigue failure (N) for seven metal alloys.
            Curves were generated using  rotating–  600            Ti-5Al-2.5Sn titanium alloy
            bending and reversed-cycle tests.
            (Data taken from the following sources and    4340 steel
            reproduced with permission of ASM
                                                   500
            International, Materials Park, OH, 44073: ASM
             Handbook, Vol. I, Properties and Selection:
            Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys,
            1990; ASM Handbook, Vol. 2, Properties and   400
            Selection; Nonferrous Alloys and Special-
            Purpose Materials, 1990; G. M. Sinclair and   Maximum stress, S (MPa)  1045 steel
            W. J. Craig, “Influence of Grain Size on Work   300
            Hardening and Fatigue Characteristics of Alpha
            Brass,” Transactions of ASM, Vol. 44, 1952.)                  Ductile cast iron
                                                   200       70Cu-30Zn brass
                                                                                           2014-T6 Al alloy

                                                   100
                                                                 EQ21A-T6 Mg alloy


                                                     0
                                                          10 4    10 5     10 6     10 7     10 8    10 9
                                                                        Cycles to failure, N
                                limit (or strength) are being considered. The scatter in results is a consequence of the fa-
                 Tutorial Video:  tigue sensitivity to a number of test and material parameters that are impossible to control
              Impact Energy vs.  precisely. These parameters include specimen fabrication and surface preparation, metal-
                   Temperature   lurgical variables, specimen alignment in the apparatus, mean stress, and test frequency.
                                   Fatigue S–N curves shown in Figure 8.20 represent “best-fit” curves that have been
                and S–N Graph   drawn through average-value data points. It is a little unsettling to realize that approxi-
                      Examples  mately one-half of the specimens tested actually failed at stress levels lying nearly 25%
                  How do I Solve   below the curve (as determined on the basis of statistical treatments).
               Problems Using the   Several statistical techniques have been developed to specify fatigue life and fatigue
                     S–N Graph?
                                limit in terms of probabilities. One convenient way of representing data treated in this
                                manner is with a series of constant probability curves, several of which are plotted in
                                Figure 8.21. The P value associated with each curve represents the probability of failure.

            Figure 8.21  Fatigue S–N probability                                                  70
            of failure curves for a 7075-T6 aluminum
            alloy; P denotes the probability of failure.                                          60
            (From G. M. Sinclair and T. J. Dolan,   400     P = 0.99
            Trans. ASME, 75, 1953, p. 867. Reprinted             P = 0.90                         50
                                                Stress, S (MPa)                                   40   Stress (10 3  psi)
            with  permission of the American Society of
             Mechanical Engineers.)               300                     P = 0.50

                                                  200     P = 0.01                                30
                                                              P = 0.10
                                                                                                  20
                                                  100
                                                                                                  10
                                                    10 4     10 5     10 6     10 7     10 8    10 9
                                                                      Cycles to failure, N
                                                                      (logarithmic scale)
   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307