Page 196 - Mathematical Models and Algorithms for Power System Optimization
P. 196

Discrete Optimization for Reactive Power Planning 187


                                                  0DVWHU 3UREOHP  03
                                            'HWHUPLQH ZKLFK FRRUGLQDWH YDULDEOH LV
                                                    WR EH DGMXVWHG




                                     6WDWH                              6WDWH
                           &DOFXODWLRQ RI LQIHDVLELOLW\ DQG IHDVLELOLW\  &DOFXODWLRQ RI LQIHDVLELOLW\ DQG IHDVLELOLW\
                                                     Fig. 6.6
                             Schematic diagram of decomposition and coordination procedure.



               6.4.3.3 Improvement of integer variables within main calculation procedure

               In the previous section, integer variables are changed one by one, making it not satisfactory in
               reducing fixed cost and requiring further improvement. This section introduces integer
               improvement procedure in detail whose principle is similar to the integer improvement
               procedure introduced in Section 6.2. However, this principle emphasizes selection among
               states. To obtain a practical solution and to further decrease the installation cost, two integers
               are changed simultaneously while keeping the feasibility of the overall problem. To accomplish
               this, the improvement procedure is divided into two stages. In Stage I, for the purpose of
               computational efficiency, the infeasibility is checked by using the simplex tableau without
               executing pivot exchange operation. In Stage II, the most promising (but likely infeasible) pair
               is tried by resolving the MIP problem to find a feasible solution.

                   Stage I: Select one pair of integers for infeasibility calculation. As the number of LPs is
                   calculated based on the number of states the number of reactive power nodes,
                   infeasibility is only expressed as simplex in the calculation without the pivoting operation
                   to improve calculation efficiency. If a pair of integers can be chosen, then plus one to one
                   integer and minus one from another. If a pair of integers cannot be chosen, rank the
                   infeasibility of each pair of integers, and move to Stage II.
                   Stage II: Choose the most possible pair of integers, that is, the pair of integers with lowest
                   infeasibility, and solve the problem with MILP method. If it is feasible and the integer
                   solution is improved, then accept the integer solution; otherwise, abandon the integer
                   solution.



               6.4.4 Implementation

               The algorithm is implemented with LP package HITACMPS-II. Numerical calculation is
               carried out on the same 135-node practical system as in Section 6.3. In the test system, all
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201