Page 789 - Mechanical Engineers' Handbook (Volume 2)
P. 789

780   Control System Design Using State-Space Methods

                          similar equation describes the discrete-time observer characteristic equation. If CACSD pack-
                          ages 4–6  supporting only controller pole placement algorithms are available, the transforma-
                          tions of Eqs. (83) and (84) are needed to select observer gains using these algorithms.
                             The observers of Eqs. (74) and (78) are called full-order observers since their dimensions
                          are the same as those of the systems whose states are being estimated. Reduction of the
                          observer dimension can be achieved by using the fact that the output equation provides us
                          with p linear equations in the unknown state, where p is the number of output variables.
                          Therefore, the observer need only provide n   p additional linear equations and thus need
                          only be of dimension n   p. For time-invariant systems, the corresponding observer gain
                          matrix can be chosen to place the n   p observer poles at any desired locations in the
                          complex plane if the original systems of Eqs. (6) and (7) or (12) and (13) in Chapter 17 are
                          completely observable. Equations for reduced-order observers for continuous-time systems
                                                      3
                          are given by Kwakernaak and Sivan and for discrete-time systems by Franklin and Powell. 11
                          In the presence of measurement noise, the state estimates x(t)or x(k) obtained using reduced-
                          order observers are more sensitive than those obtained using full-order observers.
                             The discrete-time observer of Eq. (78) is also referred to as a prediction estimator since
                          x(k   1) is ahead of the last measurements used, y(k) and u(k). A variation of this observer,
                          called the current estimator, is useful if the computation time associated with the observer
                          is very short compared to the sampling interval for the sampled-data system. The corre-
                          sponding observer equation for an LTI system is 11
                               ˆ x(k   1)   Fˆx(k)   Gu(k   L[y(k   1)   CFˆx(k)   CBu(k)   Du(k   1)]  (88)
                          The state estimate ˆx(k    1) therefore depends on the current measurements y(k   1) and
                          u(k   1). In practice, however, the measurements precede the estimate by a very small
                          computation time. The observer gain formula for a single-output system is then given by

                                                                   1
                                                                     0
                                                              CF
                                                              CF
                                                                2
                                                                     0
                                                    L     (F)                                 (89)
                                                         e
                                                              CF n   1
                          instead of Eq. (86). The term   (F) has the same meaning as before.
                                                   e
                             For multioutput LTI systems, specification of the desired observer poles does not specify
                          the gain matrix L uniquely. The additional freedom in the gain matrix selection can be used
                          to assign the eigenvectors (or generalized eigenvectors) of the matrix A   LC or F   LC
                          in addition to the eigenvalues. The corresponding procedure would be very similar to that
                          used for gain matrix selection for multi-input systems and described in Section 2. The trans-
                          formations of Eqs. (83) and (84) can be used to adapt the controller gain selection procedure
                          to observer gain selection. Alternatively, the observer gains can be chosen to design observers
                          whose state estimates have low sensitivity to unmeasured disturbance inputs. 29
                             The observer designs described work well in the absence of significant levels of mea-
                          surement noise or unknown disturbance signals. The sensitivity of the state estimates to
                          measurement noise and unknown disturbance signals depends on the specified location of
                          the observer poles. If these pole locations are too far into the left half of the complex s-
                          plane or too close to the origin in the complex z-plane, the state estimates would be unduly
                          sensitive to measurement noise and disturbance signals. In the limiting case, the observers
                          can be shown to reduce to ideal differentiators or differencing devices. The observer pole
                          locations should therefore be chosen to avoid such high sensitivities of the state estimates
                          but at the same time ensure that the estimation error transients decay more rapidly than the
                          state variables being estimated. Specification of the observer poles in practice involves con-
                          siderable trial and error in much the same manner as specification of closed-loop poles does
                          for state feedback controller design. If some information is available concerning the distur-
   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794