Page 348 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 348

T
   340   Ch a p t e r e n

              Sample ID              2a      2b      3a       3b      4a      4b
              Volume     Aggregates  5.87    4.04    22.42    23.49   50.52   49.91
              fraction   Voids       3.48    1.18    1.77     2.46    12.97   11.26
              TABLE 10.3  Volume fraction (%) of aggregates and voids.

              the FEM simulation. The pure binder specimen and the 5% aggregate specimen were
              tested for back-calculating the material constants of the elastic and viscoplasticity mod-
              els for aggregates and the binder, respectively. Then these material constants were used
              for modeling the other two specimens.

              10.2.2.4  Volume Fraction of Aggregates and Voids
              The actual volume fractions of aggregates and voids were obtained through 3D analysis
              of reconstructed images. The volume fractions of aggregates and voids for each sample
              are listed in Table 10.3. These values are important for the generation of the FEM.
                 For these small samples, the void volume fraction may be related to the aggregate
              content. If more samples were made, a more accurate trend between the volume frac-
              tions of the two phases might be obtained. This may imply that the void content can be
              controlled by the aggregate content based on some statistic study results from 3D image
              analysis. However, it should be pointed out that other factors such as the shape and
              gradation of the aggregate will affect the volume fraction relationship.

              10.2.2.5 Sample Testing
              The maximum displacement recorded varies from 1 to 3 mm. However, only the begin-
              ning part of the results was used to compare with finite element simulation results and
              to back-calculate material parameters. Due to the lack of a damage or softening compo-
              nent, simulation at large displacement may not be reasonable.
                 According to the force-displacement relationship of the pure binder sample, shown
              in Figure 10.14 (left), the stress-strain relationship for the pure binder sample can be
              established, from which the elastic modulus, yielding stress, and hardening property
              for the binder can be estimated. They were used as initial parameters in the back calcu-
              lation. After adding aggregates into the asphalt binder, the behavior of the composite
              material is significantly different from that of pure binder, especially for samples with
              higher aggregate volume fractions. However, samples with 5% aggregate are only
              slightly different from pure binder samples in terms of force-displacement response.



            2                                        1
                                       binder
                                       agg 5%      0.8
           1.5                         agg 25%
          Force (N)  1                 agg 50%    Force (N)  0.6              pure binder
                                                   0.4
           0.5                                                                agg 5%
                                                                              agg 25%
                                                   0.2
                                                                              agg 50%
            0                                        0
              0      0.01   0.02    0.03    0.04      0      0.01    0.02   0.03    0.04
                        Displacement (mm)                       Displacement (mm)
        FIGURE 10.14  Force-displacement curves from test (left) and simulation (right).
   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353