Page 163 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 163

Table 3.5 BOND DISSOCIATION ENERGIES (KCAL  MOLE-^)^
              Group IV            Group V          Group VI        Group VII
                                  NH2-H             HO-H             H-F
                                    100               116              134
                                    pH3             HS-H             H-Cl
                                    - 77b            - 90              102
                                                     H,Se            H-Br
                                                     - 66b            86
                                                     H,Te            H-I
                                                     - 57b            7  1
              a T. L. Cottrell,  The Strengths of Chemical Bonds,  Butterworths,  London,  1954.
               Average  bond energy.

              number,  more  and  more  strongly,  so  twivee_ims_ hecome  more  and
              m             compare  &dhithGwithTGJZ&tkbnndedonized     compounds. The
              electronegativity analogy, however, clearly fails in comparisons among members
              of a  given  group.  The atoms become  less  electronegative  as one goes  down  a
              column  of  the  table,  but  the  hydrides  become  stronger  acids.  Carbon  and
              iodine have the same electronegativity on the Pauling scale, but the acidities of
              CH,  and HI differ by something approaching 60 powers of ten. The-!wing
              o~laation an he&&            m the bwd disakba energies&  the hydrides
                                                   ..  .
              (Table 3.5). Thed9sreasing ele~apps~dy-~e~b~p-en-
              sz&&bja-aker   -  bond to hydrogen.85 One may rationalize the observations in a
              rough  way  by  saying &it-=going  to larger  atoms  with  valence  electrons in
              higher principal quantum levels and hence farther from the nucleus, the overlap
              with the orbital on the small hydrogen atom becomes less favorable and the bonds
              become weaker.


              It can be  seen from the foregoing discussion that the interpretations of the ob-
              served acidities leave something to be desired even for such a fundamental series
              of compounds as the simple hydrides. The matter has been  reopened  in recent,
              years by the development of techniques for measuring acidities in the gas phase.86
              The available results  reemphasize  the fact,  already well  known  from  previous
              work, that solvation factors have a profound influence on the course of acid-base
              reactions.  But  the  gas-phase  experiments  do  more  than  this;  they  call  into
              question  some  of  the  fundamental  assumptions  and  interpretations  that  haire
              long been used to account for observed acidities in terms of molecular structure.
                   As an example, let us consider the effect on acidity of substituting one hydro-
              gen of HzO by various organic groups. Table 3.6 presents the available data for
              relative acidities of the simple alcohols in solution, whereas Table 3.7  shows the
              relationships  in  the  gas  phase.  On the  basis  of  the  solution  data  alone,  one
              would  conclude  that  substitution  by  successively more  bulky  groups  causes  a
              steady lowering of acidity, although the relative positions of water and methanol
                                     ..

              85 For  a  more  complete  analysis,  see  R.  P.  Bell,  The Proton  in  Chemistry,  Cornell  University  Press,
              Ithaca, N.Y., 1959, p.  90.
              88 J. I. Brauman and L. K. Blair, J. Amer.  Chem. Soc.,  92, 5986  (1970).
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168