Page 165 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 165

Table 3.8 ORDER OF ACIDITY IN  THE  GAS PHASE FOR  SELECTED COMPOUNDS~
               Most acidic: CH3(CH2)3SH
                          CH3N02
                          'K'


























               Least acidic: H2C=CH2, 0.
                                            //,
                                                    c.4


               a  D. K. Bohme, E. Lee-Ruff, and L. B. Young, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,  94, 5153 (1972).

               correlation  was  made up of alcohols of  the  structure  RCHzOH and  include&-
               only one of the substances in Table 3.6, namely methanol.87
                    This interpretation is again one that attributes  the observed effects solely
               to the intrinsic properties of the acid and conjugate base and ignores solvation.
               The solvation might in fact be expected to be quite important, since in all likeli;
               hood the bulky  (CH,),CO-  ion will be much less well solvated than the OH-
               ion. The intrinsic bacisity of OH- will thus be reduced by solvation more than
               will that of (CH,),CO-.  The gas-phase results of Brauman and Blair (Table 3.7))
               show that in the absence of solvent, water is the weakest acid (OH- the strongest
               base) and tert-butyl alcohol  the strongest  acid  [(CH,) ,CO - the weakest base].
               If we assume that the gas-phase order reflects intrinsic molecular properties,  we
               must conclude that preferential solvation is indeed reversing the order in solution.
               Brauman and Blair feel that the inductive effects have been misinterpreted in the
               past, and that alkyl groups are better able to stabilize both positive and negative
               charge than is hydrogen. They attribute this ability to the increasing polarizability
               of the alkyl groups as they become larger, and they give the outline of a theoretical
               interpretation of the effect.

               87  P. Ballinger and F. A. Long, J. Amr. Chem. Soc.,  82, 795 (1960).
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170