Page 206 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 206

Bimolecular Nucleophilic Substitution at Sulfur  195
      Figure 4.7  Overlap of a d orbital on sulfur with a ,!I  orbital on an entering nucleophile.
      Dicoordinated Sulfur
      In its outer electronic shell divalent sulfur has two s and four p  electrons, and it
      also has five empty 3d orbitals. A bimolecular nucleophilic displacement reaction
      on sulfur might then occur in a single step; or an intermediate such as 7, in which
      the sulfur accepts the pair of electrons of the entering Lewis base into one of its
                                                   X
                                                +  I
                           Y: + X-S-R  - Y-S-R
      empty d orbitals, might be on the reaction path. For example, Figure 4.7 shows
      the overlap of an empty 3d orbital with a fullp orbital on an incoming nucleophile.
           The available evidence suggests that  a  one-step displacement is  the  usual
                                                                59 For example,
      pathway, but that some reactions may involve an ir~terrnediate.~~,
      if 7 does lie on the reaction path, then electron-withdrawing substituents on sulfur
      should stabilize it and the transition states for its formation and decomposition:
      The reaction should be faster than if there are electron-releasing groups on sulfur.
      The data in Table 4.9, however, show that for Reaction 4.27 the rate is acceler-
      ated  by  electron-withdrawing  and  electron-donating  substituents  in  much  the
      same way as are rates of direct displacements on para-substituted  benzyl chlorides.
      An  intermediate  such  as  7  thus  seems  precluded  from  the  pathway  for  this
      reaction.  Substitutions on  divalent  sulfur  normally  proceed  in  a  one-step  dis-
      placement in which both bond making and bond breaking occur at the transition
      state. When electron-donating substituents are present  in the substrate, bond
      breaking  is  further  advanced  than  bond  making;  and  when  electron-with-
      drawing groups are there,  the opposite is  true.  In either case  the  transition
      state can be stabilized  (see also Section 4.3,  p.  183).
      J. rimer. Chem. Soc.,  90, 4076 (1968); (c) M. A.  Sabol and K. K. Andersen, J. Amer.  Chem. Soc.,  91,
      3603 (1 969).
              ,
          ,
      58  For  recent  summaries of  cases in  which  an intermediate  may  be  involved  in  nucleophilic  substi-
      tution  on  dicoordinate  sulfur,  see:  (a) E.  Ciuffarin  and  F.  Griselli,  J. Amer.  Chem.  Soc.,  92, 6015
      (1970);  (b) L.  Senatore,  E.  Ciuffarin,  and A.  Fava,  J. Amer.  Chem.  Soc.,  92, 3035  (1970); (c)  E.
      Ciuffarin, J. Org. Chem., 35, 2006 (1970).
      59  Pryor  has  suggested  that  the  addition-elimination  mechanism  involving  intermediate 7  occurs
      when the attacking group is highly nucleophilic, the leaving group poor, and the centralsulfur highly
      electronegative  (see note  54  (c), p.  194). These same criteria  for a  two step mechanism  would  also
      arise from a consideration of a two-dimensional reaction coordinatc diagram.
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211