Page 237 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 237

Table 5.4 SOLVOLYSIS RATES OF ALKYL CHLORIDES'
                  Compound        R=H         R  = CH,     R=$        k~~3/k~ k@/kca3

















                SOURCE: Reprinted  with  permission from H. C.  Brown and  M.  Rei, J. Amer.  Chem. SOC., 86,  5008
                (1964). Copyright  by  the American  Chemical Society.
                a First-order rate constants, corrected to 25OC in ethanol,  10% x  sec-'.

                release that attends loss of the stable N,  molecule may leave the ion in a vibra-
                tionally excited state (the hot ion theory),38 or some products may arise from the
                diazonium  ion  directly.39  It  is  also  likely  that  ion-pair  phenomena  play  an
                important role.40 Collins 41 and Moss42 have reviewed aspects of the subject, and
                Friedman4, has discussed it at length. The field is one with much room for further
                investigation.

                The Substrate
                      --_  _
                I~an SN1 reaction the low-energy substrate ionizes to the high-energy  ion pair.
                The Hammoni-@stuIZee&cts        that the transition  state should- resemble  the
                ion
                 . pair - (see Figure 5.31; hegce_any structural change tEt lowers -. the carbocation
                                                                        -
                e~ergy should1ower  transition  state  en             .- reaction  rate.-The
                evidence provides unequivocal confirmat=on.              ~chle~er and co-
                worker~~~ estimate that for limiting SN1 reactions, with no assistance to ionization
                by nucleophiles, the substitution of H by CH,  on the reacting carbon accelerates
                the  rate  by  a  factor of  lo8, a  difference  in  activation  energy of  about  11 kcal
                mole-'.  Other data of a similar sort, but subject to uncertainty  because of un-
                certain mechanisms,  are given by Brown and Rei.45 Some of this information is
                reproduced  in  Table  5.4.  The  differences  are  not  as  large  as  that  given  by
                Schleyer,  because  reactions  of  secondary  substrates  are  being  accelerated  by
                nucleophilic  attack of solvent; nevertheless, the trends are clear.

                  D. Semenow, C.-H.  Shih, and W. G. Young, J. Amer. Chem. SOC., 80, 5472 (1958).
                39  (a) A.  Streitwieser, Jr.  and W. D.  Schaeffer, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,  79, 2888  (1957); (b) A.  Streit-
                wieser, Jr.,  J. Org. Chem., 22, 861 (1957).
                40  C. J. Collins, Accts. Chem. Res., 4, 315 (1971).
                41  See note 40.
                42  R. A.  MOSS, Chem.  &'  Eng.  News, 49,  No. 48, p.  28 (1971).
                43  L. Friedman, in Carbonium Ions, G. A. Olah and P. v. R. Schleyer, Eds., Wiley-Interscience, New
                York,  1970, Vol.  11, p.  655.
                44 J. L.  Fry, E. M. Engler,  and P. v.  R. Schleyer, J. Amer.  Chem. SOC., 94, 4628 (1972).
                45  (a) H. C. Brown and M. Rei, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 86,5008 (1964) ; (b) See also G. A. Olah, P. W.
                Westerman,  and J. Nishimura, J. Amer. Chem. SOC., 96, 3548 (1974).
   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242