Page 51 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 51

heptatriene is  correspondingly  reluctant to be converted to an eight  .rr  electron
              anion; the acidity of cycloheptatriene  (Equation 1.14) is less than that of cyclo-
              pentadiene (Equation 1.15) by roughly 20 powers of ten,29 a difference in reaction
              free energies of some 27 kcal mole-l.














                   Three-meinbered ring systems have also provided examples of aromatic and
              antiaromatic behavior.  Despite the very substantial angle strain, Breslow and his '
              collaborators  have  succeeded in    re paring  a  number  of cyclopropenyl  cations
               (51).30 Cyclopropenone (52) has been isolated and is stable in pure form below









              its  melting  point  of  -28  to  -2g°C  and  in  solution  at  room  temperat~re,~~
              even  though  the  saturated  analog  cyclopropanone  (53), which  should  be  less
              strained, polymerizes rapidly in solution at room temperature by a self-addition
              to the carbonyl group which relieves some of the strain.32
                   The contrasting reluctance of the three-membered ring T system to take on
              four electrons is illustrated by the very low acidity of triphenyl cyclopropene (54),
              estimated  to be roughly  18 powers of ten  less than that of tri~henylmethane.~~
              A number of ions and hetero-atom large ring systems are also known.34











              PROBLEMS
                   1.  (a) Write Lewis structures for each of the following molecules or ions. Show all '
                      .  .
                         significant contributing structures whenever there are more than one.

              20 See Table 3.1, pp.  146-147.
              30 See, for example, R. Bres1ow;H.  Hover, and H. W. Chang, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,  84, 3168 (1962).
              31 R. Breslow and M. Oda, J. Amer.  Chem. Soc.,  94, 4787 (1972).
              3a N. J. Turro and W. B. Hammond, J. Amer.  Chem. Soc.,  88, 3672  (1966).
              33 R. Breslow and K. Balasubramanian, J. Amer.  Chem. Soc.,  91, 5182 (1969).
              34  See note  16.
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56