Page 353 - Mechatronics for Safety, Security and Dependability in a New Era
P. 353

Ch68-I044963.fm  Page 337  Tuesday, August 1, 2006  8:30 PM
                                      1, 2006
                            Tuesday, August
                      Page 337
            Ch68-I044963.fm
                                           8:30 PM
                                                                                          337
                                                                                          337
                                             r = T r-T d,                                (3)
                  where  T d  is the compensation  time  for the system  delay and the value  is determined by trial  and  error.
                  (In the experiment,  T d =60ms.)

                  EXPERIMENTAL   INVESTIGATION  OF THE DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE     OF THE
                  SYSTEM

                   As the  experimental  condition, the  supply  pressure  p, =10MPa, the road  amplitude  x r  =±5mm,  and
                                      3
                  the  control  gain  C Aa = 4xlO %/(m/s).  In  order to  evaluate the  robustness  of the  controller,  time  error
                  AT d is  added  as  shown  in  Figure  7.  Point  A  is  the  present  position  on  the  road  and  point  B  is  the
                  preview  position  forward  of  point  A.  The  error  time  AT d (=+30%,  +50%, +100%  of  T d)  is  added  to
                  the compensation time  T d .





                                                                     0% error

                                                     " °
                                                      *  -6          +30% error
                                                     „  6
                                                      E
                                                     t  °
                                                      *  -6
                                                     ^  6
                                                      E
                                                     "  0
                                                        0            + 100°/J error


                  Figure 7: Amplitude of the road  surface  Figure  8:  Experimental results of preview control
                                                            and preview control using an ADF

                  Figure  8 shows the  experimental  results  obtained  from  the bench  system  along with various  errors  in
                  road  measurement.  In  the  figures,  x r  and  xt  denote  the  displacements  of  wheel  and  body  mass,
                  respectively.  Here, curves  of xj  with preview  control  are  indicated  by the  broken  line  in the  diagram
                  and  curves  with  preview  with  ADF  are  drawn  by  the  thick  line.  In  this  experiment,  the  rotation
                  frequency  of the eccentric disk/j  is set to be 2.5 Hz and the carrier wave frequency  of PWM/^.=20 Hz.
                  As  seen  in the  figures,  at the  larger  error the  damping  efficiency  becomes  relatively  lower  when  the
                  conventional  preview  control  system  is  adopted.  On  the  other  hand,  the  preview  control  using  the
                  ADF has a higher damping efficiency  even when a large error exits.
                  Additionally, the damping efficiency  of the individual  controller was also investigated  using a
                  frequency  response test in a frequency  range of 0.75 -  2.5 Hz. As shown  in figure  9. At first,  in the
                  case of preview control (both with ADF and without ADF), the damping efficiency  is better than the
                  case using the sky-hook control  mainly around the  low frequency  area.
   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358