Page 409 - Microsensors, MEMS and Smart Devices - Gardner Varadhan and Awadelkarim
P. 409

APPLICATIONS    389



























         -0.0003   –0.00025  -0.0002  -0.00015   -0.0001  -0.00005
                                Distance from  the edge of cavity (m)

     Figure  13.24  Variation  of the potential inside the resonator with  distance from  the centre

  particles  are subjected to a rotation vector, a Coriolis  force will be generated  perpendicular
  to their vibration  velocity vectors,  as mentioned earlier. The velocity  and the  displacement
  of  a particle  at the  antinode points  are  studied  from  the calculated  surface potential using
  COM  theory  and  are  presented  in  Figures  13.25  and  13.26,  respectively.
    The  velocity  of  a  particle  in  the  middle  of  the  resonator  at  the  antinode  point  is
  calculated  for  the  resonant  frequency.  Using  this  velocity  value  and  the  mass  at  the
  antinodal  points,  the  Coriolis  force  is  calculated  for  different  input rates.  This  Coriolis
  force  is the  input to the  gyroscope  sensor,  which is  discussed  later.
    After  modeling  the resonator, it  is  imperative  to know  the  sensor  characteristics. The
  cross-field  model  was chosen  to simulate the  sensor  and gyroscope.  Various SAW sensors
  have  been  successfully represented  and  simulated  using the  cross-field equivalent circuit
  model  derived  from  the  Mason  circuit.  In  order  to  model  the  SAW  gyrosensor,  which
  generates  a voltage  output owing to rotation,  the  induced  SAW due  to  the  Coriolis  force
  has  to be  modeled  as an input force through the  transformer ratio  in the  SAW equivalent
  circuit.  In  this  model,  the  electric  field  distribution under  the  electrode  is  approximated
  as  normal  to  the  piezoelectric  substrate,  which  is  equivalent  to  a  parallel-plate  capac-
  itor.  Each  IDT  is  represented  by  a  three-port  network,  as  shown  in  Figure  13.27.  Here
  port  1  and  2  represent  the  electrical  equivalent  of  acoustic  ports  and  port  3  is  a  true
  electrical  port.
    Using  an  RF  transmission  line  analogy,  the  three-port  network  circuit  can  be  repre-
  sented  as  shown  in  Figures  13.28  and  13.29.  Figure  13.28  is  the  representation  of  one
  pair  of  IDTs  and  Figure  13.29  for  that  of  a pair  of  reflectors. The  acoustic  forces  F  are
  transformed  to electrical  equivalent voltages  V  and particle  velocities  at the  surface  v  are
  transformed  to equivalent currents  /.  These  transformations can be written in terms  of a
  proportionality  constant 0 as
   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414