Page 153 - MODELING OF ASPHALT CONCRETE
P. 153

Complex Modulus fr om the Indir ect Tension Test    131


                    testing for 25 Hz. Following each loading frequency, a 5-minute rest period was allowed
                    before the next frequency was applied.
                       Averaged deformations were used to calculate the dynamic modulus and phase
                    angle. In the uniaxial case, readings from four LVDTs spaced at 90° intervals were
                    averaged. In IDT, the vertical deformations and horizontal deformations from two
                    surfaces were averaged to determine the deformation in each axis.

               Comparison of Dynamic Moduli Values


                    Graphical Comparison
                    The IDT test data of the 24 mixtures were analyzed using the viscoelastic solutions in
                    Eq. (5-26). The resulting dynamic modulus mastercurves from these analyses are plotted
                    in Figs. 5-4 to 5-6 for the 12 representative mixtures. The reference temperature of 10°C
                    was used as the basis of shifting the data. The data presented in these figures are the
                    averages of the three replicates. The rest of the data can be found in Kim et al. (2005).
                       It can be observed from these figures that the dynamic modulus mastercurves
                    developed from the IDT test using the biaxial linear viscoelastic solution are generally
                    in good agreement with those determined from the axial compression test. It was also
                    found that the time-temperature shift factors obtained during the construction of the
                    mastercurves are essentially identical for the axial compression and IDT tests.


                    Statistical Analysis

                    Using P-Value
                    Recognizing that a sample-to-sample variation exists, a statistical analysis was
                    conducted using the unequal variance t-test for each mixture at two frequencies for
                    each testing temperature. In this analysis, all the individual replicates (three from the
                    axial compression and three from the IDT tests) were used. The null hypothesis is that
                    the dynamic modulus from the IDT test is the same as that from the axial compression
                    test. The P-value was calculated and compared with the critical value of 0.05 to reject or
                    accept the null hypothesis. The P-value indicates the extent to which a computed test
                    statistic is unusual in comparison with what would be expected under the null
                    hypothesis. Therefore, in this study a P-value greater than 0.05 indicates that the
                    dynamic modulus from the IDT test is statistically the same as that from the axial
                    compression test.
                       A summary of the P-values for 144 tests (2 frequencies  × 3 temperatures  × 24
                    mixtures) is given in Table 5-3. About 19% of the tests indicate that the dynamic modulus
                    from the IDT test is statistically different from the dynamic modulus from the axial
                    compression test.

                    Using Percent Difference
                    In addition to the statistical analysis, the percent difference was calculated for the
                    dynamic moduli determined from the axial compression and IDT tests for 288
                    combinations of temperature and frequency (8 frequencies × 3 temperatures × 12 mixes).
                    These values are also summarized in Table 5-3. A comparison of the data in this table
                    and further investigation of individual test data resulted in several important
                    observations.
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158