Page 291 - Modern Control Systems
P. 291

Section 4.8  Design  Examples                                       265

                        We compute  5"^ as follows:
                                                   _  dG(s)  p  _   -2/7
                                                 G
                                                ft  =
                                                      dp   G(s)    s  +  p'
                        and
                                                                     2
                                 _          1        _              S (S  +  Pf
                               , T
                              S'r  =                     4     2     2       2
                                    1  +  G c{s)G p{s)G{s)  s  +  2ps  +  (p  +  K D)s  +  K Ps  +  K,'
                        Therefore,
                                     -r   T  r                2p(s  +  p)s 2
                                    Si  =  SlS°  =  —.    =   - ^   ^ - =           .      (4.73)
                                     p      p      4     3     2       2                  v    }
                                          °       s  +  2ps  +  (p  +  K D)s  +  K Ps  +  K,
                                                             7
                        We must evaluate the sensitivity function  S p, at various values  of frequency. For low
                                                                        T
                        frequencies  we can approximate  the system sensitivity S p by
                                                        P
                                                         ~    K,-
                        So at low frequencies  and  for  a given p  we can reduce the system sensitivity to varia-
                        tions in p  by increasing the PID gain, K/.  Suppose that three PID gain sets have  been
                        proposed, as shown in Table 4.2. With p  =  2 and the PID gains given as the cases 1-3  in
                        Table 4.2, we can plot the magnitude of the sensitivity S^  as a function  of frequency  for
                        each PID controller. The result is shown in Figure 4.26. We see that by using the PID 3
                        controller  with  the  gains  K P  =  6, K D  =  4, and  Kj  =  4, we have  the  smallest  system
                        sensitivity  (at  low frequencies)  to  changes  in  the  process  parameter, p.  PID  3  is  the
                        controller  with the  largest  gain  K t.  As  the frequency  increases  we see in Figure  4.26
                        that the sensitivity increases, and that PID 3 has the highest peak  sensitivity.
                           Now we consider the  transient  response. Suppose  we want  to reduce the  MAP
                        by a 10% step change. The associated  input  is


                                                    «(,)  =  *  =  »».
                                                            s    s
                        The  step response  for  each PID  controller  is shown  in Figure 4.27. PID  1 and PID  2
                        meet  the  settling  time  and  overshoot  specifications;  however  PID  3  has  excessive
                        overshoot.  The  overshoot  is  the  amount  the  system  output  exceeds  the  desired
                        steady-state response. In this case the desired steady-state response is a 10% decrease
                        in the  baseline  MAP. When  a  15% overshoot  is realized, the  MAP  is decreased  by


                        Table 4.2  PID Controller Gains and System Performance Results
                                                 Input response  Settling    Disturbance  response
                         PID   K P   K D   K,    overshoot  (%)  time (min)  overshoot  (%)
                         1  6        4     1     14.0            10.9        5.25
                        2      5     7     2     14.2             8.7        4.39
                        3      6     4     4     39.7            11.1        5.16
   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296