Page 287 - Modern Control of DC-Based Power Systems
P. 287

246                                 Modern Control of DC-Based Power Systems


          case of ideal CPL switched LRCs, such oscillations do not appear for
          the switched CPL switched LRCs case.
             All  decentralized  virtual  disturbance-based  controllers  (LQG,
          Backstepping, Synergetic) exhibited a certain robustness towards changing
          scenario conditions; they exhibited also a robustness towards modeling
          error, like the disconnections of a LRC which made the control reaction
          of the Synergetic control not usable, as it is a model-based controller.
             In the switched LRC simulations, the usage of steady-state Kalman fil-
          ter in a closed-loop control did not exhibit any obvious restrictions even
          though the system is assumed by definition linear.
             The switched LRC simulations also revealed that the Adaptive
          Backstepping controller cannot be used in its actual implementation for
          switching frequency of 1 kHz, as the duty cycle oscillates rapidly between
          0 and 1 and such a behavior would severely limit the lifetime of the
          equipment. This explains why in all cited Adaptive Backstepping applica-
          tions only low power converters in a cascaded configuration are used
          [7,8]. They operate with switching frequencies of 40 kHz 1 MHz.
          There the simple discretization procedure seems good enough; however,
          detailed plots of the duty cycle are not shown.
             To adapt the Adaptive Backstepping controller a time-discrete
          Lyapunov design procedure based on sampled data would need to be
          undertaken without guaranteeing a 1 kHz switching frequency; moreover,
          it seems that with Adaptive Backstepping the duty cycle will always oscil-
          late. The observed duty cycle in Fig. 6.20 is a sign that in the nonlinear
          process of power estimation in combination with variable structure sys-
          tems, hidden dynamics are present which influence the results and do not
          let the power estimation process converge to a constant steady-state value.

          REFERENCES
          [1] N. Doerry, Naval Power Systems: integrated power systems for the continuity of the
             electrical power supply, IEEE Electr. Mag. 3 (2) (2015) 12. 21, June.
          [2] IEEE Recommended Practice for 1 kV to 35 kV Medium-Voltage DC Power
             Systems on Ships, IEEE Std. 1709 2010, pp. 1, 54, Nov. 2 2010.
          [3] R.W. Erickson, D. Maksimovi´ c, Fundamentals of Power Electronics, second ed.,
             Kluwer Academic, Norwell, Mass, 2001.
          [4] I. Kondratiev, A Synergetic Control for Parallel-connected DC-DC Buck Converters,
             PhD Dissertation, University of South Carolina, College of Engineering and
             Information Technology, 2005.
          [5] I. Kondratiev, R. Dougal, General synergetic control strategies for arbitrary number
             of paralleled buck converters feeding constant power load: implementation of dynamic
             current sharing, 2006 IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electr. vol. 1 (2006). no., pp. 257, 261,
             9-13 July.
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292