Page 182 - Optofluidics Fundamentals, Devices, and Applications
P. 182

Optofluidic Photonic Crystal Fibers: Pr operties and Applications   157


               this is found to adjust the surface energy of silica so that the water
               meniscus contact angle is close to the desired 90 degrees. Figure 7-18
               shows the flattening effect of the organosilane layer on the water
               meniscus in the square capillary.
                  The now flat meniscus is moved using pressure applied from a
               syringe coupled to the square capillary using silicone rubber tubing
               sealed with epoxy. A video microscope is used to track the position of
               the meniscus. The SMF probe is connected to a thermal halogen
               broadband white light source with a wavelength range of 1.0 to
               1.8 μm while the collection SMF is connected to an OSA. Figure 7-18
               shows the device transmission as the meniscus is pushed across the
               beam. The transmission starts out spectrally flat, and then develops a
               pronounced resonance as the meniscus traverses the beam. Figure 7-19
               shows (solid line) the transmission spectrum when the meniscus
               crosses the center of the beam. A strong resonance is observed, cen-
               tered at 1.31 μm. The resonance depth reaches almost −30 dB, whereas
               the out-of-resonance loss is maintained at −4 dB. This out-of-resonance
               loss is related to beam divergence across the total extent of the square
               capillary and could be further reduced. Figure 7-19 also shows (dots)
               the experimental transmission of the device without organosilane
               coatings in the silica capillary. There is a marked difference (some 10 dB)
               in the out-of-resonance insertion loss between the silanized and non-
               silanized capillaries, due to the curvature of the meniscus deflecting
               the beam away from the output.


                       0

                       –5

                      –10
                     Insertion loss (dB)  –15


                      –20

                      –25
                                                     Experiment
                                                     3-D BPM simulation
                      –30

                        0.9  1.0  1.1  1.2  1.3  1.4  1.5  1.6  1.7  1.8
                                         Wavelength (μm)
               FIGURE 7-19  Experimental (solid line) spectral response of the device as
               compared to 3-D BPM numerical simulation (dashed line) when the meniscus
               is well centered. (C. Grillet, P. Domachuk, V. Ta’eed, et al., “Compact tunable
               microfl uidic interferometer,” Opt. Express, 12, 5440–5447 (2004).)
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187