Page 62 - Organic Electronics in Sensors and Biotechnology
P. 62

Scaling Effects in Organic Transistors and Transistor-Based Chemical Sensors   39

                           110
               carbon chains.  Therefore, in addition to the polar nature of analyte
               molecules, sensing response could be adjusted with the use of polar
                                                                    110
               vs. nonpolar side chain moieties of the organic semiconductor.  For
               instance, ethanol showed no electrical response with the nonpolar
               side chain but did show a response with the polar side chain. This
               was most likely due to a poor interaction of the short ethanol alkyl
               chain to the nonpolar side chain and a much better interaction of the
               polar ethanol to the polar side chain.
                   In case of nanoscale OTFT sensors where the injection at contacts
               dominates charge transport, the increases in magnitude of the source-
               to-drain current upon exposure to the analyte is due to changes in the
               nature of how charge is injected into the channel. When carriers are
               injected into the semiconductor, they accumulate close to the contact
               interface and induce the image charge in the metal electrode and thus
               form an interface dipole. 123, 124  The polarity of the analytes can work to
               shield carriers in the semiconductor from the reverse electric field
               which results from the interface dipole. The larger the dipole moment
               in the analyte, the greater the shielding effect and thus the stronger the
               response in drain-current increase. Also, the smaller the channel length,
               the stronger this effect owing to greater domination of the injection-
               limited charge transport. For example, the injection barrier at contacts
               between Au and pentacene is attributed to the existence of interface
               dipoles. As Fig. 1.22a shows, due to the work function of Au (5.1 eV)
               and the electron affinity (2.6 eV)/energy gap (2.5 eV) of pentacene, the
               Fermi level of  Au meets with the HOMO level of pentacene. 125, 126


                         E vac
                                 2.6 eV
                         LUMO
                  5.1 eV
                                 2.5 eV
                         HOMO
                    Au      Pentacene  Au        Au     Pentacene  Au
                                                   (b) On contacting, without
                      (a) Before contacting.
                                                         interface dipole.

                             Δ
                                                    (c) On contacting, with
                                                         interface dipole.
                             Δ

                            – +        +  –
                             Interface dipole
                          Au      Pentacene      Au
               FIGURE 1.22  The diagram for the formation of injection barrier at contacts
               between Au and pentacene, due to the existence of interface dipoles.
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67