Page 294 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 294

C HAP TE R 15


             Industry Effect on MRP



















        To better understand the competitive position of an enterprise, the relationship
        between the volumes produced by the company and the variety produced is compared.
        An interesting diagonal has evolved where most companies are clustered in order to
        compete effectively. This position on the diagonal is the optimal position in terms of pro-
        duction cost and responsiveness. Movements from that competitive diagonal can be
        either a competitive advantage for the company or a disaster. According to Wheelwright
        and Hayes, this can be represented in the produce/process matrix shown in Figure 15-1.
             This figure shows an inverse relationship between variety and volume. In general,
        as the product volume increases, the variety tends to decrease. Attempting to compete off
        this diagonal is not sustainable.


        PROJECT MANUFACTURING COMPANY

        The far upper-left corner of the volume/variety matrix is a company that produces a very
        high variety of products but in very low volume. This can mean that a single product
        may be developed, planned, and produced once and never produced again. These prod-
        ucts or deliverables typically are managed as unique projects. A project-driven company
        competes in the market based on the wide variety of products that it can produce using
        the same resources. This type of company uses some material requirements planning
        (MRP) for determining what needs to be ordered and when. In addition, this organiza-
        tion normally will use a project management system to determine the critical path for the
        activities of the project. The tools of the project management company also include a pro-
        gram-evaluation review technique (PERT) and Gantt charts. These tools can provide the
        expected finish date once the start date is determined using forward scheduling. For each
        task in the scheduling network, by using forward scheduling, the earliest a task can start
        is calculated. Or, given a desired completion date, the suggested start date can be calcu-


                                                                                        273
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299