Page 159 - Photoreactive Organic Thin Films
P. 159

ZOUHEIR SEKKAT AND WOLFGANG KNOLL

                 of the effect of pressure on water as a pressure medium were performed
                 without polymer film, and the refractive index of water, n water) increased at
                 pressure. n water is known for each pressure value and taken into account for
                 the determination of the optical constants of the polymer film. The refractive
                 index of water is considerably smaller than that of PMMA-DR1 at all
                 pressures (for example at 100 MPa, «SS" = 1.345±0.003 and WPMMA-DRI =
                 1.630±0.003). The increase of n PMMA_ DR1 up to 1.636 at 150 MPa (vide infra]
                 cannot be due to the absorption of water by the polymer, otherwise n PMMA_ DK
                 should decrease rather than increase. Even though water molecules are smalL
                 they do not penetrate into the polymer film studied. Figure 4.24 shows that
                 most photo-orientation is suppressed at 150 MPa. Assuming that pressure
                 does not affect noticeably the lateral dimensions of the films, the thickness
                 variation mentioned previously implies a - 2.4% volume change at that
                 pressure value. A volume fraction, i.e., free volume, is necessary for the
                 isomeric and reorientational movement of most of the azo chromophores in
                 PMMA-DR1. This near 2.4% volume change is due to a change in density
                 that couples to a change in the refractive index of the material. It can be
                 rationalized by the following Clausius-Mosotti equation: 68

                                                2
                                          2
                                   M- (" -l("  + 2) Ap                          (4J)
                 where «, and p are the isotropic refractive index and the density of the
                 material, respectively, and An and Ap are the corresponding changes induced
                                                                           §
                 by pressure. We found experimentally that «, i.e., «PMMA-D#IJ i  equal to
                 1.636 at 150 MPa for a 633 -nm probe light and that consequently Equation
                 4.1 predicts a An value of 0.019 for a 2.4% change in density, whereas the
                 experimentally measured value for An at 150 MPa is ~ 0.018. This value is
                                                            2
                 obtained by multiplying the slope, i.e., ~ 0.012*10~ /MPa, of An versus pressure
                 by 150 MPa. The Clausius-Mosotti equation well supports the claimed ~ 2,4%
                 change in the sample's density at 150 MPa; it also supports the arguments we
                 put forth concerning free-volume reduction by pressure. The free volume size
                 necessary for one DR1 molecule isomerization in PMMA-DR1 is discussed next.
                     The gradual reduction of DR1 photo-orientation with increased pressure
                 implies a distribution of local free- volume elements of different sizes available
                 to the trans isomers in PMMA-DR1, a concept that has theoretical
                        49 69 70
                 support, ' '  and that is experimentally observed and discussed in the
                                                                                 13 19
                                                         49
                 literature for photoisomerization in polymers  and poled PMMA-DR1. '
                 Photo-orientation in the glassy state requires a minimum, critical size of local
                 free volume in the vicinity of the chromophore — the photo-orientation activation
                 volume, i.e., the volume swept by the chromophore during photoisomerization
                                                                        71
                 and photo-orientation geometrical rearrangement (vide infra).  During the
                 early time evolution, the cis concentration is negligible, and the observed
                 anisotropy is dictated by the trans orientation. In fact, the rate k, i.e., the
                 slope, of the early time photo-orientation is proportional to the quantum
                 yield of the trans— >cis photoisomerization, which, as far as friction effects are
                 concerned, is the only material parameter that can be pressure dependent in
                   72
                 k.  Reaction rates at high pressure are theoretically and experimentally
                               63 66
                 rationalized by: "
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164