Page 418 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources
P. 418
Index 393
Pigging (S~PU/.XJ Inspection) 74, 107. 128,382 Quantitatwe risk assessment (see QRA t
PIM (pipeline integrity management) 259 Quantitative model (see Model)
Pinhole leak (see Hole size)
Pipestrength 92-101. 143-6,363-6
Pipeline Radar (see Ground penetrating)
construction 93-4.99 Radiant heat (seeThermal radiation)
depth 298 Radiation, thermal (see Thermal)
dynamics 213 Radio frequency detection (see RF detection)
installation (see J-lay, S-lay) Range (see Dispersion)
integrity management (see PIM) Rangeability (see Dispersion)
locating (see Line locating) Rate (see Corrosion)
operators (see Operators) RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) 138
products 357-9 Reaction times I63
properties (charactenstics) 112 Reactivity 137-8
seam (seeah ERW) 98 Receptor(seea/so LIF) 165, 170-4,241-2,255,305-6.375.7
strength (see also Materials) 363-8 Rectifier 80,82,383
wallflaws 110 Rehabilitation 236
Pipe-ro-soil potential i \ee also CIS, DCVG) 8 1-2 Release (seeaiso Leak, Spill) 147,383
Plastic 234-6 Reliability 19
Platform (see Offshore) Relief valves (see Safety system)
Point event 179.80 Remote terminal units (see RTU)
Polanzation isee Surveys) Remotevalve 160, 163
Political instability (see Sabotage) Remotely operated vehicle (see ROW
Polyethylene pipe (see PE) Reportable quality (see RQ)
Polyvinyl chloride pipe (see PCP) Request for proposal (RFP; see Proposals)
Pool size. liquid spill 151-53 Resistivity (see Soil)
Populationdensity 26.28.30, 128, 1656,263,305 Resource allocation 343
Potential (see Surge) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (see RCRA)
Potential damage (see ubo Sabotage, Third-party damage) 99 Revenues from pipeline 220
Potential threats 56 RF detection (radio frequency) 52-3
Potential upset (see Upset) RFP (request for proposal; see Proposals)
PPA (pressure point analysis; see Leak detection) Rigidpipe 234
PPM (predictive preventive maintenance) 132,280 Risk
PRA (probabilistic risk assessment) 23-25.294 absolute 15
Predictive preventive maintenance (see PPM) acceptable 334
Presentation graphics I88 algorithms 278,369-73
Pressure, maximum (see also MOP) 94 assessment methods 7-8. IO, 22,36
Pressure point analysis (see PPA) communications 352
Pressure switch (see Safety) compansons 355
Pressure test(wTest) cnteria 336-42
Pressure vessel 101 cumulative 333
Preventions 29,73 decision points
Prioritization, of mitigation 343 definition 4
Probabilistic nsk assessment (see PRA) of environmental damage (see
Probability(seerrlro Failure probability) 4-5. 104 Environmental)
ofexceedance 113 factors 29
Procedures individual 335
for human error prevention (.xe also Human error) 132.28 I management 7, 13. 10. 18.22, 178.
for internal corrosion (see Corrosion) 225,331-55
maintenance (see Maintenance) management program (see RMP)
for nsk programadministration 352 model (see Model)
for surge (see Surge) other 355
Process safety management (see PSM) process 9-10
Product program administration 348-352
charactenstics (see Product hazard) relative 15.44
contamination (see Contamination) roll ups (see CR)
corrosivity (see Corrosion) of sabotage (see Sabotage)
hazard 136-42,272,383 scope 30
specifications deviation (see PSD) scoring (see Scoring)
Programs (see Computers) societal 335
Propetty, high value (see HVA, Land use, Set hack distances) variables 22-4,45,94-1 10, 178,263
PSD (product specification deviation) 21 1-4 Riverian regions 168,383
PSM (process safety management) 259 River crossing survey 47
Public education 44.53,228,246,383 RMP (risk management program) 348
Pumps. sabotage (see Sabotage) Root cause analysis 36
PVC (polyvinyl chloride pipe) ROV (remotely operated vehicle) 25 I
ROW (right ofway) 29,38,383
condition 44,54,228
ORA (quantitative risk assessment) distribution systems 228
23,294,329-30,337 facilities 257-9
Quality 18,32, 182,346 offshore 247
assurance (QA) and Control (QC) 182-3 RQ (reportable quality; see ah
data 181-2 Chronic hazards) 138
Qualitative model (see Model) RSTRENG 366

