Page 92 - Pipeline Rules of Thumb Handbook
P. 92

Construction  79

           to estimate the in situ relative density of cohesionless soils.  recommendations are meant to be used only as a starting
           Some geotechnical firms will conduct these penetration tests  point in the design. It is recommended that in the final design,
           in cohesive materials and rock, and to a lesser extent, the con-  specific stresses be calculated and compared with allowable
           sistency of cohesive soils and the hardness of rock can be  limits.
           determined.
             Thinwalled “Shelby” Tube Sampling—Most geotech-
           nical firms prefer to use a Thinwalled Tube Sampling method
           for obtaining samples of cohesive materials. These tests are
                                                                          Diameter (D)   Wall thickness (t)
           conducted in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-
           1587. This test is similar to the Standard Penetration test   6≤ and smaller       0.250≤
           except the sample is collected by hydraulically pushing a thin-  6 to 12≤          0.375≤
           walled seamless steel tube with a sharp cutting edge into the   12 to 30≤          0.500≤
           ground. The hydraulic pressure required to collect the sample     ≥30≤             D/t <50
           is noted on the field log. This produces a relatively undis-
           turbed sample that can be further analyzed in the laboratory.
           These samples can be field tested with handheld penetrom-
           eters, but more accurate readings of density and consistency  (For high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe, a standard
           can be obtained by performing unconfined compressive   dimension ratio of D/t, SDR, of 11 or less is recommended
           strength tests where the results are noted in tons per square  and the pipe manufacturer should be consulted.)
           foot. Generally, for directional drilling contractors a standard  Stress Analysis—In finalizing the design, the stresses
           penetration test using the split spoon sampler described  imposed during construction and in-service must be calcu-
           above will suffice in both materials.                  lated and checked to be within allowable limits for the grade
             Sieve Analysis of Granular Materials—A sieve analysis  of material. The stresses at each stage must be considered
           is a mechanical test of granular materials performed on  acting individually and in combination. Stresses result due to
           samples collected in the field during the standard penetration  spanning between rollers prior to pullback, the hydrostatic
           test with the split spoon sampler. The split spoon samples   testing pressures, pulling forces during installation, radius of
           are taken to the laboratory and processed through a series of  curvature as the pipe enters the ground, the drilling profile
           screens. The sample provides a percentage analysis of the  curvature, external pressures in the drilled hole, and the
           granular material by size and weight. It is one of the most  working pressure.
           important tests undertaken.
             Rock Information—If rock is encountered during the    1. Pre-installation
           soils investigation borings, it is important to determine the  a. Hoop and longitudinal stresses resulting from hydro-
           type, the relative hardness and the unconfined compressive    static testing are calculated.
           strength. This information is typically collected by the geo-  b. Using the known distance between rollers as the
           technical drilling firm by core drilling with a diamond bit core  free spanning distance, the maximum hogging and
           barrel. The typical core sample recovered with this process  sagging moments can be calculated. Considering the
           has a 2-in. diameter. The type of rock is classified by a geol-  greater of these two moments, the maximum span-
           ogist. The geologist should provide the Rock Quality Desig-  ning stress is calculated.  Note: during hydrostatic
           nation (RQD) which rates the quality of the rock based on    testing the pipeline will be full of water therefore the
           the length of core retrieved in relation to the total length of  additional weight of water must be included in these
           the core. The hardness of the rock (Mohs’ Scale of Hardness)  calculations.
           is determined by comparing the rock to ten materials of  2. Installation
           known hardness. The compressive strength is determined by  a. The spanning stresses calculated in stage 1.b. also
           accurately measuring the core and then compressing the core  apply in this installation phase.
           to failure. This information pertaining to the underlying rock  b. The theoretical pulling force must be determined in
           formation is imperative to determine the type of downhole    order to provide the stresses that will result. An
           equipment required and the penetration rates that can be     assumed downhole friction factor of 1.0 is recom-
           expected.                                                    mended to provide conservative results and to
                                                                        include the effect of the pipeline being pulled around
                                                                        a curve. The maximum predicted pulling force
                         Pipe material selection                        should then be used in calculating the resulting lon-
                                                                        gitudinal stress.
             Wall Thickness—D/t “Rule of Thumb”—The following        c. Allowing for a 10% drilling tolerance leads to the use
           table provides generalized recommendations for the selection  of a radius of curvature 90% of the design radius
           of steel pipe wall thicknesses relative to pipe diameter. These  when calculating the longitudinal curvature stresses.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97