Page 225 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 225

198                                                              Chapter 12


           There is an interesting difference between the contribution of the two moment terms along the
           centerline. From the solution of the elementary problem of a horizontal long beam tensioned
           axially in the gravitational field, it follows that only at distances less than:

                                                                              (12.24)

           from the ends does the bending moment differ from a constant term. The rest behaves as a
           catenary. For pipelay, this distance is normally small compared to the length of the free span.
           Therefore, we can say that the boundary conditions only have a local influence in bending.
           The twist is entirely different: A rotation of the pipe at the tensioner is immediately felt at the
           touch-down point. Twist acts over long distances, as does the gravity force.


           How does the residual strain in the overbend change the value of  the potential energy? An
           example will  illustrate the point:  Consider first that the  suspended pipe  is entirely in  the
           vertical plane. Assume two pipelay scenarios that only differ because one material remains
           completely elastic, whereas the other experiences plastic strains in the overbend section on the
           stinger. In the underbend section, the pipe with plastic strain hangs higher than the elastic one
           because its natural (unloaded) shape has become convex. This means that the potential energy
           is  higher  for  the  plastically  deformed pipe  than  for  the  elastic  one.  Allowing  for  a  3D
           deformation, the bent pipe can reduce its potential energy through twist. The elastic pipe is
           already at its lowest potential energy and so it is stable.

           It is reasonable to conclude from this argumentation that the reduction of potential energy is
           the  mechanism  that  underlies  pipeline  rotation  during  pipelaying.  The  theory  of  large
           deflection of beams is found in classic texts, e.g. Landau or Love.


           A non-linear 3D finite element program can solve the virtual work equation with very few
           approximations. Three simple models will illustrate the main point of interest. All represent a
           pipe of length 1218 m and with D/t=36. They are all fixed in one end and pinned in the other
           where a sliding condition is specified. Both ends are at the same elevation and the body force
           is  equal  to  the  submerged  weight. In  order  to  produce  elastic  strains below  0.035% an
           appropriate horizontal force is applied in the pinned end to represent the lay tension.


           A 3D load-case is created by means of a horizontal force corresponding to a sea current of 0.5
           m/s  that is applied normal to the plane of the equilibrium configuration. First the horizontal
           force is applied, and  then  the submerged weight. Before the  application of  the  horizontal
           force, the pinned end is locked in all translational degrees of  freedom at their current values.
           The models are:


           1.  Straight pipe
           2.  Pre-curved "overbend" pipe, R=571 m,
           3.  Pre-curved "underbend pipe, R=571 m,


           The displacement and rotation of a point in the middle of the span will be studied for each of
           the models. The equilibrium configurations shown are similar to that of the underbend during
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230