Page 165 - Plastics Engineering
P. 165

148                                   Mechanical Behaviour of Plastics

                        test data and product performance and (b) between test results from different
                        laboratories. The first of these problems is the more serious because it can raise
                        doubts in the mind of the designer about the use of plastics.
                          Fortunately the situation in practice is not quite as complex as it might seem.
                        In general, very acceptable designs are achieved by using impact data obtained
                        under conditions which relate as closely as possible to the service conditions.
                        Impact strength values available in  the literature may  be  used for the initial
                        selection of  a  material  on  the  basis  of  a  desired  level of  toughness. Then,
                        wherever possible this should be backed up by tests on the plastic article, or a
                        specimen cut from it, to ensure that the material, as moulded, is in a satisfactory
                        state to perform its function.
                          As always, of course, to alleviate fracture problems it is essential to avoid the
                        factors which are likely to cause brittleness. These include stress concentrations
                        and low temperatures and the effects of these will be considered in the following
                        sections.

                        2.22.1 Effect of Stress Concentrations
                        During service the impact behaviour of a plastic article will be influenced by the
                        combined effects of  the applied stress system and the geometry of  the article.
                        Although the applied stress system may appear simple (for example, uniaxial) it
                        may become triaxial in local areas due to a geometrical discontinuity. Fig. 2.78



























                                            i


                                         Fig. 2.78  Triaxial stress distribution at a notch
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170